XPEV vs. FHKCX
XPEV (XPeng Inc.) is a stock, while FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) is China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, XPEV returned -20.34%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for FHKCX. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPEV achieves a -35.90% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 25.83% return.
XPEV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- -27.70%
- YTD
- -35.90%
- 1Y
- -27.98%
- 3Y*
- -13.45%
- 5Y*
- -20.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.25%
FHKCX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- 25.83%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 27.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
XPEV XPeng Inc. | $76.91M | $85.61M | $102.52M |
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPEV XPeng Inc. | -35.90% | 71.57% | -18.99% | 46.78% | -80.25% | 17.51% | 85.41% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 25.83% | 42.56% | 23.15% | -0.29% | -23.87% | -13.69% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPEV and FHKCX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XPEV and FHKCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPEV vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank
XPEV
FHKCX
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPEV | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 4.05 | -4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 11.52 | -12.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPEV drawdown since its inception was -91.12%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPEV and FHKCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPEV | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.12% | -61.96% | -29.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.93% | -12.24% | -44.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.07% | -22.02% | -44.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.35% | -48.17% | -40.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.99% | -10.06% | -71.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.20% | -20.18% | -48.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.61% | 4.30% | +29.31% |
Volatility
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison
XPeng Inc. (XPEV) has a higher volatility of 11.79% compared to Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) at 8.73%. This indicates that XPEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPEV | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.79% | 8.73% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.94% | 20.80% | +14.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.56% | 24.78% | +30.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.04% | 24.71% | +53.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.72% | 22.66% | +60.06% |
Dividends
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison
XPEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.39% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 10.77% | 4.85% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.35% | 15.47% |
XPEV XPeng Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPEV and FHKCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPEV has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to FHKCX (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPEV dropped -91.12% vs FHKCX's -61.96%.
FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPEV and FHKCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer