XPEV vs. FHKCX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX).

FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.

Performance

XPEV vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XPEV vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XPEV XPeng Inc.	-15.63%	71.57%	-18.99%	46.78%	-80.25%	17.51%	101.84%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	5.51%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	15.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPEV achieves a -15.63% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 5.51% return.

XPEV

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -2.56%
• YTD: -15.63%
• 6M: -26.94%
• 1Y: -17.42%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: -14.27%
• 10Y*: —

FHKCX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -9.04%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 43.83%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XPEV vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPEV

XPEV Risk / Return Rank: 31
XPEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XPEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XPEV Omega Ratio Rank: 30
XPEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XPEV Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPEV vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XPEV	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	1.87	-2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	2.41	-2.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.35	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	2.51	-2.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	9.74	-10.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XPEV vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPEV Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPEV and FHKCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XPEV	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	1.87	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	0.12	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.40	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between XPEV and FHKCX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XPEV vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

XPEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XPEV XPeng Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.66%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%

Drawdowns

XPEV vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPEV drawdown since its inception was -91.12%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPEV and FHKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPEV	FHKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.12%	-61.96%	-29.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.46%	-15.94%	-27.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.35%	-53.82%	-34.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.29%	-10.80%	-65.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.56%	-20.37%	-47.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.80%	4.12%	+17.68%

Volatility

XPEV vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

XPeng Inc. (XPEV) has a higher volatility of 19.88% compared to Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) at 9.27%. This indicates that XPEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPEV	FHKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.88%	9.27%	+10.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.94%	16.45%	+27.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.50%	23.16%	+38.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.16%	23.97%	+55.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.44%	22.10%	+62.34%