XPEV vs. FHKCX
Compare and contrast key facts about XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX).
FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XPEV or FHKCX.
Key characteristics
| XPEV | FHKCX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.31% | 25.65% |
| 1Y Return | -12.71% | 26.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -34.56% | -3.72% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.14 | 1.26 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.33 | 1.89 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.04 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.11 | 0.54 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.21 | 5.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 48.48% | 5.00% |
| Daily Std Dev | 74.48% | 21.23% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.12% | -60.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -81.06% | -31.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPEV and FHKCX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XPEV achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 25.65% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPeng Inc. (XPEV) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison
XPEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPEV XPeng Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.53% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 0.13% | 0.97% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.14% | 16.83% | 15.96% | 12.04% |
Drawdowns
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPEV drawdown since its inception was -91.12%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -60.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPEV and FHKCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XPEV vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison
XPeng Inc. (XPEV) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) at 7.92%. This indicates that XPEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.