PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLMR vs. LUMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLMR vs. LUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLMR achieves a -14.77% return, which is significantly lower than LUMN's 9.27% return.


PLMR

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.67%
YTD
-14.77%
6M
-9.27%
1Y
-28.63%
3Y*
25.45%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*

LUMN

1D
0.00%
1M
-15.52%
YTD
9.27%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
110.15%
3Y*
58.55%
5Y*
-8.90%
10Y*
-5.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLMR vs. LUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PLMR
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
-14.77%27.63%90.25%22.90%-30.28%-27.09%75.96%172.92%
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
9.27%46.33%190.16%-64.94%-55.48%38.82%-19.18%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PLMR and LUMN is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.17

The correlation between PLMR and LUMN shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLMR:

$3.14B

LUMN:

$8.48B

EPS

PLMR:

$7.18

LUMN:

-$1.75

PS Ratio

PLMR:

3.22

LUMN:

0.70

PB Ratio

PLMR:

3.27

LUMN:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLMR:

$977.99M

LUMN:

$12.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLMR:

$401.29M

LUMN:

$1.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLMR:

$210.26M

LUMN:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLMR vs. LUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLMR
PLMR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PLMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PLMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

LUMN
LUMN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLMR vs. LUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLMRLUMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.26

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

2.17

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

4.11

-5.30

PLMR vs. LUMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLMR Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the LUMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLMR and LUMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLMR vs. LUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLMR drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum LUMN drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMR and LUMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLMRLUMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.86%

-95.26%

+32.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.51%

-47.34%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.27%

-69.66%

+27.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.81%

-92.54%

+38.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.62%

-58.92%

+24.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.81%

-27.66%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.17%

24.94%

-0.77%

Volatility

PLMR vs. LUMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is 11.03%, while Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a volatility of 22.04%. This indicates that PLMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLMRLUMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

22.04%

-11.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.78%

57.12%

-33.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.57%

80.17%

-43.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.68%

85.30%

-42.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.88%

67.61%

-19.73%

Dividends

PLMR vs. LUMN - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLMR nor LUMN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.37%7.97%10.26%7.57%14.26%12.95%9.08%8.59%
PLMR
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLMR vs. LUMN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palomar Holdings, Inc. and Lumen Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
278.94M
2.90B
(PLMR) Total Revenue
(LUMN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLMR vs. LUMN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Palomar Holdings, Inc. and Lumen Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
PLMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LUMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PLMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LUMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 602.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

PLMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.95M and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

LUMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -200.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLMR and LUMN have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUMN has higher volatility (22.04%) compared to PLMR (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMR dropped -62.86% vs LUMN's -95.26%.

LUMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLMR and LUMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer