PLDR vs. GDMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA).

PLDR and GDMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLDR is an actively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada. It was launched on May 25, 2021. GDMA is an actively managed fund by Gadsden. It was launched on Nov 14, 2018.

Performance

PLDR vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLDR vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	-9.19%	12.03%	23.47%	27.47%	-22.52%	11.57%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	5.56%	25.29%	7.44%	1.72%	-2.08%	-1.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLDR achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 5.56% return.

PLDR

• 1D: 2.64%
• 1M: -5.79%
• YTD: -9.19%
• 6M: -5.46%
• 1Y: 10.26%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDMA

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 30.39%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLDR vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.

GDMA

Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF

PLDR

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

PLDR vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR

PLDR Risk / Return Rank: 33
PLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GDMA

GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 96
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLDR	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	2.52	-1.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	3.29	-2.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.48	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	4.72	-3.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.93	14.01	-11.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLDR vs. GDMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the GDMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLDR and GDMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLDR	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	2.52	-1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.85	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and GDMA is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PLDR vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison

PLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than GDMA's 2.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	0.41%	0.37%	0.38%	0.56%	0.63%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	2.65%	2.79%	2.32%	4.14%	1.18%	2.10%	0.62%	3.17%

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLDR drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, which is greater than GDMA's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDR and GDMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLDR	GDMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.58%	-16.66%	-12.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.03%	-6.44%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.51%	-6.06%	-4.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-3.78%	-5.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	2.17%	+1.52%

Volatility

PLDR vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) at 4.01%. This indicates that PLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLDR	GDMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	4.01%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.58%	9.88%	-0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	12.12%	+4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	9.44%	+7.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	10.82%	+6.34%