PL vs. GGP.L
PL (Planet Labs PBC) and GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) are both stocks. PL operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while GGP.L operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, PL returned 117.50%/yr vs 64.07%/yr for GGP.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PL vs. GGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PL is traded in USD, while GGP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 68.00% return, which is significantly higher than GGP.L's 15.09% return.
PL
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -35.22%
- YTD
- 68.00%
- 6M
- 67.83%
- 1Y
- 443.11%
- 3Y*
- 117.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGP.L
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -18.10%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 78.16%
- 3Y*
- 64.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 59.55%
PL vs. GGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL Planet Labs PBC | 68.00% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -45.33% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 15.09% | 340.75% | -36.57% | 29.75% | -55.34% | 17.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PL and GGP.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.04 |
The correlation between PL and GGP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PL:
$11.45B
GGP.L:
£4.17B
PL:
-$1.17
GGP.L:
£0.47
PL:
31.50
GGP.L:
4.45
PL:
25.80
GGP.L:
4.95
PL:
$335.61M
GGP.L:
£937.29M
PL:
$186.28M
GGP.L:
£483.25M
PL:
-$125.70M
GGP.L:
£477.73M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PL vs. GGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PL
GGP.L
PL vs. GGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PL | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.23 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.15 | 2.43 | +6.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.19 | 5.83 | +22.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PL vs. GGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.11%, smaller than the maximum GGP.L drawdown of -98.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and GGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PL | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.11% | -98.61% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.83% | -31.98% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.17% | -54.95% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.54% | -25.05% | -10.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -67.59% | +12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.82% | 13.36% | +2.46% |
Volatility
PL vs. GGP.L - Volatility Comparison
Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 41.66% compared to Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) at 20.50%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PL | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.66% | 20.50% | +21.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.65% | 45.46% | +28.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.54% | 65.33% | +38.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.01% | 66.63% | +18.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.01% | 91.82% | -6.81% |
Dividends
PL vs. GGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PL nor GGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PL vs. GGP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Labs PBC and Greatland Gold plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PL and GGP.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PL and GGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer