PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PL vs. SWIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PLSWIM
YTD Return1.62%122.05%
1Y Return19.52%163.66%
3Y Return (Ann)-38.00%-29.41%
Sharpe Ratio0.221.65
Sortino Ratio0.782.90
Omega Ratio1.111.32
Calmar Ratio0.181.58
Martin Ratio0.7811.37
Ulcer Index19.31%13.01%
Daily Std Dev68.73%89.65%
Max Drawdown-85.73%-93.55%
Current Drawdown-78.80%-82.14%

Fundamentals


PLSWIM
Market Cap$736.62M$675.25M
EPS-$0.47$0.10
Total Revenue (TTM)$180.38M$512.11M
Gross Profit (TTM)$97.66M$134.04M
EBITDA (TTM)-$57.69M$56.97M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between PL and SWIM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PL vs. SWIM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than SWIM's 122.05% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
29.34%
57.79%
PL
SWIM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PL vs. SWIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PL, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PL, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.78
SWIM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SWIM, currently valued at 11.37, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.37

PL vs. SWIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the SWIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL and SWIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.22
1.65
PL
SWIM

Dividends

PL vs. SWIM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PL nor SWIM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PL vs. SWIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.73%, smaller than the maximum SWIM drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and SWIM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-78.80%
-82.14%
PL
SWIM

Volatility

PL vs. SWIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Planet Labs PBC (PL) is 14.59%, while Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that PL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.59%
15.81%
PL
SWIM

Financials

PL vs. SWIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Labs PBC and Latham Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items