PortfoliosLab logo
PL vs. SWIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PL and SWIM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PL vs. SWIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PL:

1.18

SWIM:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

PL:

2.00

SWIM:

1.68

Omega Ratio

PL:

1.25

SWIM:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

PL:

1.28

SWIM:

0.56

Martin Ratio

PL:

4.28

SWIM:

2.67

Ulcer Index

PL:

25.42%

SWIM:

19.15%

Daily Std Dev

PL:

84.91%

SWIM:

87.26%

Max Drawdown

PL:

-85.73%

SWIM:

-93.55%

Current Drawdown

PL:

-67.57%

SWIM:

-82.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PL:

$1.19B

SWIM:

$655.15M

EPS

PL:

-$0.42

SWIM:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

PL:

4.87

SWIM:

1.29

PB Ratio

PL:

2.70

SWIM:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

PL:

$183.91M

SWIM:

$509.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PL:

$109.23M

SWIM:

$149.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

PL:

-$57.33M

SWIM:

$47.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly higher than SWIM's -18.82% return.


PL

YTD

-4.95%

1M

16.72%

6M

-2.29%

1Y

98.96%

3Y*

-14.20%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SWIM

YTD

-18.82%

1M

3.39%

6M

-14.78%

1Y

50.67%

3Y*

-15.93%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Planet Labs PBC

Latham Group, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PL vs. SWIM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PL is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PL is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PL is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PL is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PL is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PL is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SWIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SWIM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SWIM is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SWIM is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SWIM is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SWIM is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SWIM is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PL vs. SWIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PL Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the SWIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL and SWIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PL vs. SWIM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PL nor SWIM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PL vs. SWIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.73%, smaller than the maximum SWIM drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and SWIM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PL vs. SWIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Planet Labs PBC (PL) is 13.00%, while Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) has a volatility of 20.30%. This indicates that PL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PL vs. SWIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Labs PBC and Latham Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
61.55M
111.42M
(PL) Total Revenue
(SWIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PL vs. SWIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Planet Labs PBC and Latham Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
62.1%
29.5%
(PL) Gross Margin
(SWIM) Gross Margin
PL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Planet Labs PBC reported a gross profit of 38.22M and revenue of 61.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.1%.

SWIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Latham Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.88M and revenue of 111.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.

PL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Planet Labs PBC reported an operating income of -19.37M and revenue of 61.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -31.5%.

SWIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Latham Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.93M and revenue of 111.42M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.4%.

PL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Planet Labs PBC reported a net income of -35.15M and revenue of 61.55M, resulting in a net margin of -57.1%.

SWIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Latham Group, Inc. reported a net income of -5.96M and revenue of 111.42M, resulting in a net margin of -5.4%.