PKB vs. RSPG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 15.78%/yr vs 9.46%/yr for RSPG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.

Performance

PKB vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 31.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed RSPG with an annualized return of 15.78%, while RSPG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.46% annualized return.

PKB

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 14.33%
• 6M: 10.23%
• 1Y: 37.69%
• 3Y*: 27.82%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: 15.78%

RSPG

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: 31.50%
• 6M: 28.78%
• 1Y: 37.06%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 20.90%
• 10Y*: 9.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	14.33%	22.47%	20.24%	55.29%	-24.88%	32.96%	24.49%	40.15%	-31.11%	24.67%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	31.50%	7.01%	6.09%	4.49%	57.97%	57.73%	-32.44%	13.38%	-24.68%	-6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and RSPG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.51

The correlation between PKB and RSPG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PKB vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PKB	RSPG
Industrials	41.7%	-
Basic Materials	36.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	19.4%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Energy	2.4%	100.0%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

PKB vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB

PKB Risk / Return Rank: 48
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 62
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PKB	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.84	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.40	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	3.30	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	9.35	-2.14

PKB vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the RSPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and RSPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PKB vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and RSPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PKB	RSPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.21%	-79.98%	+14.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.41%	-12.18%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.75%	-23.06%	-6.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-28.44%	-6.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	-73.17%	+20.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-7.62%	+3.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.75%	-25.44%	+9.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	4.29%	+0.57%

Volatility

PKB vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) at 7.06%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PKB	RSPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	7.06%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.69%	17.00%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.78%	21.79%	+1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.78%	28.36%	-2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.29%	33.54%	-6.25%

PKB vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PKB vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than RSPG's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.23%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.30%	0.37%	0.54%	0.17%	0.31%	0.11%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	1.99%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PKB and RSPG in my portfolio?

PKB and RSPG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PKB or RSPG?

PKB has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to RSPG (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs RSPG's -79.98%.

Which ETF is better, PKB or RSPG?

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.78% vs 9.46% for RSPG. On fees, RSPG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPG has been the lower-risk option at 7.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PKB or RSPG?

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PKB or RSPG?

RSPG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PKB or RSPG?

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.

What is the main difference between PKB and RSPG?

PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while RSPG is Energy Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.40% for RSPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.