PKB vs. IAK
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 15.78%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for IAK. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IAK.
Performance
PKB vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed IAK with an annualized return of 15.78%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively lower 12.67% annualized return.
PKB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
PKB vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 14.33% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and IAK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PKB and IAK has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PKB vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
IAK
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Industrials
PKB
IAK
-
Basic Materials
PKB
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
IAK
-
Utilities
PKB
IAK
-
Financial Services
PKB
IAK
Communication Services
PKB
-
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
IAK
-
Energy
PKB
-
IAK
-
Healthcare
PKB
-
IAK
Real Estate
PKB
-
IAK
-
Technology
PKB
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
IAK
PKB vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.06 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 0.57 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 1.27 | +5.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -77.38% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -7.62% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -11.58% | -18.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -14.76% | -20.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | -44.95% | -7.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -0.23% | -4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -16.11% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 3.41% | +1.45% |
Volatility
PKB vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 5.49%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 5.49% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.69% | 10.75% | +7.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.78% | 15.10% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.78% | 18.14% | +7.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 20.92% | +6.37% |
PKB vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKB vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than IAK's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and IAK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKB has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to IAK (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.78% vs 12.67% for IAK. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.
PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while IAK is Financials Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.43% for IAK.
PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer