PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAK vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAK vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 17.14% return.


IAK

1D
2.19%
1M
3.60%
YTD
3.62%
6M
2.70%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
13.20%

DIVB

1D
1.02%
1M
1.64%
YTD
17.14%
6M
16.48%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAK vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
3.62%9.50%28.25%11.28%11.33%26.84%-2.86%25.94%-11.48%1.51%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
17.14%15.09%18.59%13.27%-10.51%31.29%10.78%32.72%-8.16%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IAK and DIVB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between IAK and DIVB has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAK vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAK vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAKDIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.42

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

4.08

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

13.64

-11.77

IAK vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAK Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAK and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAK vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than DIVB's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAKDIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.38%

-36.93%

-40.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-6.82%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-15.45%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

-21.08%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.10%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-4.97%

-11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

2.04%

+1.37%

Volatility

IAK vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) at 4.61%. This indicates that IAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAKDIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

4.61%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

8.84%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

11.70%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

15.26%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

18.36%

+2.51%

IAK vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAK has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAK vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than DIVB's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.27%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%0.00%0.00%
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.58%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAK and DIVB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAK has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to DIVB (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAK dropped -77.38% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

On 5-year performance, IAK leads with 14.57% vs 12.39% for DIVB. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DIVB has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IAK has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IAK.

IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.27% for DIVB.

IAK is categorized as Financials Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IAK and 0.05% for DIVB.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAK and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer