PKB vs. FLM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - PKB tracks the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index while FLM tracks the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 15.37%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for FLM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FLM.

Performance

PKB vs. FLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLM's 19.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed FLM with an annualized return of 15.37%, while FLM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.

PKB

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 34.15%
• 3Y*: 29.75%
• 5Y*: 15.65%
• 10Y*: 15.37%

FLM

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 19.89%
• 6M: 18.51%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 22.72%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: 8.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. FLM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	13.11%	22.47%	20.24%	55.29%	-24.88%	32.96%	24.49%	40.15%	-31.11%	24.67%
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	19.89%	13.99%	17.94%	19.36%	-9.87%	12.98%	0.51%	12.81%	-21.72%	22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and FLM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2008	0.71

The correlation between PKB and FLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PKB vs. FLM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PKB	FLM
Industrials	47.2%	37.1%
Basic Materials	29.0%	7.4%
Consumer Cyclical	20.8%	-
Utilities	3.0%	0.7%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	8.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	5.7%
Technology	-	7.9%

Return for Risk

PKB vs. FLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB

PKB Risk / Return Rank: 42
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FLM

FLM Risk / Return Rank: 68
FLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FLM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. FLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PKB	FLM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.15	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.93	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	4.01	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	13.80	-6.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PKB vs. FLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the FLM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and FLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PKB	FLM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.15	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.64	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.45	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.38	-0.01

Drawdowns

PKB vs. FLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than FLM's maximum drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and FLM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PKB	FLM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.21%	-50.07%	-15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.41%	-7.19%	-8.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.75%	-19.14%	-10.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-23.71%	-11.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	-50.07%	-2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.33%	-0.71%	-4.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-10.84%	-4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	2.08%	+2.67%

Volatility

PKB vs. FLM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) at 4.27%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PKB	FLM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.61%	4.27%	+3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.84%	10.39%	+7.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.04%	13.45%	+9.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.69%	16.82%	+8.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.24%	18.73%	+8.51%

PKB vs. FLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FLM's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

PKB vs. FLM - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FLM's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	1.01%	1.19%	1.31%	1.16%	2.10%	1.45%	2.88%	1.84%	1.74%	1.49%	2.01%	1.17%
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.23%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.30%	0.37%	0.54%	0.17%	0.31%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PKB and FLM in my portfolio?

PKB and FLM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PKB or FLM?

PKB has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to FLM (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs FLM's -50.07%.

Which ETF is better, PKB or FLM?

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.37% vs 8.40% for FLM. On fees, PKB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FLM has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PKB or FLM?

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.37% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PKB or FLM?

PKB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PKB or FLM?

FLM has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.

What is the main difference between PKB and FLM?

PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.70% for FLM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.