PJUN vs. PMAR

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June) and PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PJUN tracks the S&P 500 Price Return Index while PMAR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUN returned 6.82%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for PMAR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

PJUN vs. PMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJUN achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than PMAR's 5.38% return.

PJUN

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 2.95%
• 1Y: 10.06%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: —

PMAR

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 6.12%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: 12.68%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJUN vs. PMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June	2.36%	11.62%	12.40%	12.28%	-7.75%	7.13%	11.49%
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March	5.38%	11.82%	12.83%	15.95%	-2.65%	10.96%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PJUN and PMAR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020	0.85

The correlation between PJUN and PMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

PJUN vs. PMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PJUN	PMAR
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

PJUN vs. PMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJUN

PJUN Risk / Return Rank: 79
PJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PMAR

PMAR Risk / Return Rank: 88
PMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJUN vs. PMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PJUN	PMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.75	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	4.06	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.62	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	3.58	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.00	21.14	-0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PJUN vs. PMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the PMAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUN and PMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PJUN	PMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.75	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	1.15	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.90	-0.10

Drawdowns

PJUN vs. PMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUN drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum PMAR drawdown of -17.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUN and PMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJUN	PMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.31%	-17.18%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-4.11%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.09%	-9.32%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.51%	-10.84%	-1.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-0.92%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-1.56%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.70%	-0.22%

Volatility

PJUN vs. PMAR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) at 1.15%. This indicates that PJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJUN	PMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	1.15%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.55%	4.24%	-0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.66%	5.37%	-0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.21%	8.18%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.73%	10.72%	-0.99%

PJUN vs. PMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PJUN and PMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

PJUN vs. PMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJUN nor PMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PJUN and PMAR in my portfolio?

PJUN and PMAR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PJUN or PMAR?

PJUN has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to PMAR (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUN dropped -16.31% vs PMAR's -17.18%.

Which ETF is better, PJUN or PMAR?

On 5-year performance, PMAR leads with 9.33% vs 6.82% for PJUN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PJUN or PMAR?

Over the 5-year period, PMAR has performed better with a 9.33% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PJUN or PMAR?

PJUN and PMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PJUN or PMAR?

PJUN and PMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PJUN and PMAR?

PJUN tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while PMAR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.