PJUN vs. IGV
PJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUN returned 6.77%/yr vs 3.25%/yr for IGV. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PJUN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
PJUN vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUN achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -10.50% return.
PJUN
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 8.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.68%
IGV
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 1Y
- -12.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- 15.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.45B | $1.32B | $1.70B | |
| $1.30M | $1.49M | $7.65M |
PJUN vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June | 3.58% | 11.62% | 12.40% | 12.28% | -7.75% | 7.13% | 10.40% | 6.68% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -10.50% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 13.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUN and IGV is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PJUN and IGV has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PJUN vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUN
IGV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PJUN
IGV
Financial Services
PJUN
IGV
Communication Services
PJUN
IGV
Consumer Cyclical
PJUN
IGV
Healthcare
PJUN
IGV
-
Industrials
PJUN
IGV
Consumer Defensive
PJUN
IGV
-
Energy
PJUN
IGV
-
Utilities
PJUN
IGV
-
Real Estate
PJUN
IGV
-
Basic Materials
PJUN
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUN vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
PJUN
IGV
PJUN vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJUN | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.93 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | -0.42 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | -0.79 | +13.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJUN vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUN drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUN and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUN | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.31% | -63.45% | +47.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -36.61% | +33.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.09% | -36.61% | +26.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.51% | -45.85% | +33.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -19.69% | +19.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -14.49% | +12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 19.35% | -18.74% |
Volatility
PJUN vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) is 2.00%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that PJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUN | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 6.80% | -4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.43% | 25.02% | -20.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.23% | 29.16% | -23.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 28.16% | -19.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 26.45% | -16.77% |
PJUN vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJUN vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
PJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
PJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUN and IGV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to PJUN (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUN dropped -16.31% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 5-year performance, PJUN leads with 6.77% vs 3.25% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PJUN has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJUN has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUN.
IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for PJUN.
PJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IGV is Technology Equities. PJUN tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUN and 0.39% for IGV.
PJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUN and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer