PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJUN vs. IGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJUN vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJUN achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -5.19% return.


PJUN

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.51%
YTD
3.51%
6M
4.26%
1Y
11.27%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*

IGV

1D
-4.33%
1M
13.30%
YTD
-5.19%
6M
-6.07%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
16.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJUN vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June
3.51%11.62%12.40%12.28%-7.75%7.13%10.40%7.23%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
-5.19%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%16.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PJUN and IGV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PJUN and IGV has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PJUN vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJUN
IGV

Technology

36.2%
89.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
1.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

PJUN
36.2%
IGV
89.2%

Financial Services

PJUN
11.9%
IGV
1.8%

Communication Services

PJUN
10.9%
IGV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PJUN
10.1%
IGV
0.3%

Healthcare

PJUN
8.4%
IGV

-

Industrials

PJUN
8.1%
IGV
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

PJUN
4.9%
IGV

-

Energy

PJUN
3.5%
IGV

-

Utilities

PJUN
2.3%
IGV

-

Real Estate

PJUN
1.9%
IGV

-

Basic Materials

PJUN
1.8%
IGV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJUN vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJUN
PJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJUN vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJUNIGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

-0.17

+2.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

-0.04

+3.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.99

+0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

-0.13

+4.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.91

-0.27

+24.18

PJUN vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUN and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJUNIGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

-0.17

+2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.25

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.37

+0.45

Drawdowns

PJUN vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUN drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUN and IGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJUNIGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-63.45%

+47.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-36.61%

+33.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.09%

-36.61%

+26.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.51%

-45.85%

+33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-14.93%

+14.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-14.44%

+12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

17.22%

-16.75%

Volatility

PJUN vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) is 0.52%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that PJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJUNIGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

11.63%

-11.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

24.39%

-21.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

27.61%

-23.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

27.86%

-19.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.72%

26.35%

-16.63%

PJUN vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJUN vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJUN nor IGV has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%
PJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJUN and IGV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to PJUN (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUN dropped -16.31% vs IGV's -63.45%.

On 5-year performance, PJUN leads with 7.05% vs 6.80% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PJUN has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUN.

PJUN and IGV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IGV is Technology Equities. PJUN tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUN and 0.46% for IGV.

PJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJUN and IGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer