PJUN vs. IGV
PJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) are both exchange-traded funds - PJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology-Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUN returned 7.05%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for IGV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PJUN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IGV.
Performance
PJUN vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUN achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -5.19% return.
PJUN
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
PJUN vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June | 3.51% | 11.62% | 12.40% | 12.28% | -7.75% | 7.13% | 10.40% | 7.23% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 16.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUN and IGV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PJUN and IGV has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PJUN vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUN
IGV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PJUN
IGV
Financial Services
PJUN
IGV
Communication Services
PJUN
IGV
Consumer Cyclical
PJUN
IGV
Healthcare
PJUN
IGV
-
Industrials
PJUN
IGV
Consumer Defensive
PJUN
IGV
-
Energy
PJUN
IGV
-
Utilities
PJUN
IGV
-
Real Estate
PJUN
IGV
-
Basic Materials
PJUN
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUN vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
PJUN
IGV
PJUN vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUN | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | -0.17 | +2.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.87 | -0.04 | +3.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.99 | +0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | -0.13 | +4.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.91 | -0.27 | +24.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUN | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | -0.17 | +2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.25 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.37 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
PJUN vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUN drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUN and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUN | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.31% | -63.45% | +47.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -36.61% | +33.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.09% | -36.61% | +26.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.51% | -45.85% | +33.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -14.93% | +14.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -14.44% | +12.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 17.22% | -16.75% |
Volatility
PJUN vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) is 0.52%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that PJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUN | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 11.63% | -11.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 24.39% | -21.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 27.61% | -23.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.19% | 27.86% | -19.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.72% | 26.35% | -16.63% |
PJUN vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJUN vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
Neither PJUN nor IGV has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
PJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUN and IGV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to PJUN (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUN dropped -16.31% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 5-year performance, PJUN leads with 7.05% vs 6.80% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJUN has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUN.
PJUN and IGV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IGV is Technology Equities. PJUN tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUN and 0.46% for IGV.
PJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUN and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer