PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJUN vs. IGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJUN vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJUN achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -10.50% return.


PJUN

1D
0.46%
1M
0.39%
6M
2.94%
YTD
3.58%
1Y
8.45%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.68%

IGV

1D
1.36%
1M
1.08%
6M
4.75%
YTD
-10.50%
1Y
-12.92%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
15.95%
ALL TIME*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.45B$1.32B$1.70B
$1.30M$1.49M$7.65M

PJUN vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June
3.58%11.62%12.40%12.28%-7.75%7.13%10.40%6.68%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
-10.50%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PJUN and IGV is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PJUN and IGV has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PJUN vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJUN
IGV

Technology

37.9%
89.3%

Financial Services

11.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

10.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
0.3%

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Industrials

8.4%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Energy

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

PJUN
37.9%
IGV
89.3%

Financial Services

PJUN
11.7%
IGV
1.9%

Communication Services

PJUN
10.0%
IGV
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PJUN
9.6%
IGV
0.3%

Healthcare

PJUN
9.1%
IGV

-

Industrials

PJUN
8.4%
IGV
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

PJUN
4.6%
IGV

-

Energy

PJUN
3.0%
IGV

-

Utilities

PJUN
2.3%
IGV

-

Real Estate

PJUN
1.9%
IGV

-

Basic Materials

PJUN
1.7%
IGV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJUN vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PJUN
PJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PJUN vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PJUNIGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.93

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

-0.42

+3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

-0.79

+13.92

PJUN vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUN and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PJUN vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUN drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUN and IGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJUNIGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-63.45%

+47.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-36.61%

+33.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.09%

-36.61%

+26.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.51%

-45.85%

+33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-19.69%

+19.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-14.49%

+12.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

19.35%

-18.74%

Volatility

PJUN vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) is 2.00%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that PJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJUNIGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

6.80%

-4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

25.02%

-20.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.23%

29.16%

-23.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

28.16%

-19.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.68%

26.45%

-16.77%

PJUN vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJUN vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

PJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%
PJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJUN and IGV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to PJUN (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUN dropped -16.31% vs IGV's -63.45%.

On 5-year performance, PJUN leads with 6.77% vs 3.25% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PJUN has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PJUN has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUN.

IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for PJUN.

PJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while IGV is Technology Equities. PJUN tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUN and 0.39% for IGV.

PJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJUN and IGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer