PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJUN vs. BFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJUN vs. BFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJUN vs. BFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June
-0.13%11.62%12.40%12.28%-7.75%7.13%9.96%
BFEB
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February
-1.98%12.99%17.58%22.35%-6.76%18.05%10.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJUN achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than BFEB's -1.98% return.


PJUN

1D
1.62%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.64%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
6.44%
10Y*

BFEB

1D
2.08%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
0.96%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJUN vs. BFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PJUN and BFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

PJUN vs. BFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJUN
PJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BFEB
BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJUN vs. BFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJUNBFEBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.14

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

1.74

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.67

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.92

8.76

+2.17

PJUN vs. BFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the BFEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUN and BFEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJUNBFEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.14

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.90

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.79

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between PJUN and BFEB is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PJUN vs. BFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJUN nor BFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PJUN vs. BFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUN drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum BFEB drawdown of -26.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUN and BFEB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJUNBFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-26.37%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-9.20%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.51%

-14.84%

+2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-4.46%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-2.75%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.76%

-0.52%

Volatility

PJUN vs. BFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) is 2.60%, while Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that PJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJUNBFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

3.97%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

6.48%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

13.15%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.18%

11.40%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.83%

14.33%

-4.50%