PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFV vs. PJFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJFV vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJFV vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PJFV
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
2.44%18.65%24.13%18.52%-2.19%
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
-11.44%16.94%31.59%54.23%-6.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFV achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than PJFG's -11.44% return.


PJFV

1D
1.08%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
2.44%
6M
7.02%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
10Y*

PJFG

1D
1.15%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-11.44%
6M
-11.13%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJFV vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PJFV and PJFG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

PJFV vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFV
PJFV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PJFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFG
PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFV vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFVPJFGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

0.64

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.09

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

0.84

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.38

2.78

+5.60

PJFV vs. PJFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the PJFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFV and PJFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFVPJFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.64

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

1.09

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between PJFV and PJFG is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PJFV vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison

PJFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
PJFV
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
0.67%0.68%1.31%1.20%0.12%
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PJFV vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFV drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum PJFG drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFV and PJFG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFVPJFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-24.24%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

-19.00%

+6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-15.03%

+11.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-3.71%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

5.70%

-2.93%

Volatility

PJFV vs. PJFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) is 5.56%, while PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that PJFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJFVPJFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

7.23%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

13.45%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

23.56%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

21.06%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

21.06%

-6.98%