PJFV vs. DDIV
PJFV (PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF) and DDIV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJFV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by PGIM, while DDIV is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index. PJFV is actively managed, while DDIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PJFV returned 24.88%/yr vs 21.11%/yr for DDIV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PJFV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DDIV.
Performance
PJFV vs. DDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJFV achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than DDIV's 9.05% return.
PJFV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 16.25%
- 1Y
- 34.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDIV
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
PJFV vs. DDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF | 16.89% | 18.65% | 24.13% | 18.52% | -3.25% |
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 9.05% | 12.23% | 27.18% | 9.95% | -3.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJFV and DDIV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PJFV and DDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PJFV vs. DDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJFV
DDIV
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PJFV
DDIV
Technology
PJFV
DDIV
Financial Services
PJFV
DDIV
Consumer Cyclical
PJFV
DDIV
Energy
PJFV
DDIV
Healthcare
PJFV
DDIV
Utilities
PJFV
DDIV
Communication Services
PJFV
DDIV
Consumer Defensive
PJFV
DDIV
Basic Materials
PJFV
DDIV
Real Estate
PJFV
-
DDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJFV vs. DDIV — Risk / Return Rank
PJFV
DDIV
PJFV vs. DDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJFV | DDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.28 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 1.95 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.89 | 7.14 | +12.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJFV vs. DDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJFV drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum DDIV drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFV and DDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJFV | DDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -47.56% | +29.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -11.31% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.15% | -18.97% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.51% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -6.00% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 3.07% | -1.35% |
Volatility
PJFV vs. DDIV - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) at 3.14%. This indicates that PJFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJFV | DDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.14% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 11.64% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 14.36% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 18.54% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 19.90% | -5.72% |
PJFV vs. DDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJFV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DDIV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJFV vs. DDIV - Dividend Comparison
PJFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than DDIV's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 1.59% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.60% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.93% | 3.27% |
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF | 0.59% | 0.68% | 1.31% | 1.20% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJFV and DDIV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJFV has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to DDIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFV dropped -18.15% vs DDIV's -47.56%.
On 3-year performance, PJFV leads with 24.88% vs 21.11% for DDIV. On fees, DDIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PJFV has performed better with a 24.88% return vs 21.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFV.
DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.59% for PJFV.
PJFV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DDIV is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PJFV and 0.60% for DDIV.
PJFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJFV and DDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer