PJFV vs. HIDV
PJFV (PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PJFV returned 24.88%/yr vs 20.68%/yr for HIDV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PJFV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.
Performance
PJFV vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJFV achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than HIDV's 8.94% return.
PJFV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 16.25%
- 1Y
- 34.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJFV vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF | 16.89% | 18.65% | 24.13% | 20.93% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 8.94% | 14.64% | 26.01% | 20.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJFV and HIDV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between PJFV and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJFV vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank
PJFV
HIDV
PJFV vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJFV | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.36 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 2.58 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.89 | 11.05 | +8.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJFV vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJFV drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, roughly equal to the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFV and HIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJFV | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -18.76% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -9.57% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.15% | -18.76% | +0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -2.75% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -2.05% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.23% | -0.51% |
Volatility
PJFV vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJFV | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.12% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 9.57% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 12.27% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 14.57% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 14.57% | -0.39% |
PJFV vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJFV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJFV vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison
PJFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than HIDV's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.38% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF | 0.59% | 0.68% | 1.31% | 1.20% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJFV and HIDV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJFV has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to HIDV (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFV dropped -18.15% vs HIDV's -18.76%.
On 3-year performance, PJFV leads with 24.88% vs 20.68% for HIDV. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PJFV has performed better with a 24.88% return vs 20.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFV.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.59% for PJFV.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PJFV and 0.45% for HIDV.
PJFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJFV and HIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer