PJFG vs. LSGR

In the year-to-date period, PJFG achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than LSGR's 0.86% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PJFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGR's 0.59% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PJFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the LSGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFG and LSGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

The maximum PJFG drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, which is greater than LSGR's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFG and LSGR.

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is 5.29%, while Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that PJFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.