PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJFG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFG achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.


PJFG

1D
-0.77%
1M
8.02%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.10%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
8.15%16.94%31.59%54.23%-6.69%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFG and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022

0.95

The correlation between PJFG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PJFG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJFG
QQQ

Technology

48.4%
53.8%

Communication Services

20.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
12.3%

Healthcare

6.0%
4.2%

Industrials

4.9%
2.8%

Financial Services

3.4%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
7.7%

Utilities

1.6%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

PJFG
48.4%
QQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

PJFG
20.2%
QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PJFG
12.6%
QQQ
12.3%

Healthcare

PJFG
6.0%
QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

PJFG
4.9%
QQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

PJFG
3.4%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

PJFG
3.0%
QQQ
7.7%

Utilities

PJFG
1.6%
QQQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

PJFG

-

QQQ
1.1%

Energy

PJFG

-

QQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

PJFG

-

QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJFG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFG
PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFGQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

2.73

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

3.55

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.71

-2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.84

14.30

-10.46

PJFG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFGQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.73

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.41

+0.97

Drawdowns

PJFG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFG drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-82.97%

+58.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.00%

-11.96%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.24%

-22.77%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

0.00%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-32.79%

+29.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

3.11%

+2.93%

Volatility

PJFG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is 4.01%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that PJFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJFGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.48%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

12.11%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

15.95%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

22.39%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

22.30%

-1.43%

PJFG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJFG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PJFG and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to PJFG (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFG dropped -24.24% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.89% vs 24.62% for PJFG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PJFG has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFG.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for PJFG.

PJFG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PJFG and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJFG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer