PJFG vs. QQQ
PJFG (PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by PGIM, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. PJFG is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PJFG returned 24.62%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for QQQ. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PJFG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
PJFG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJFG achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.
PJFG
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 22.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
PJFG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF | 8.15% | 16.94% | 31.59% | 54.23% | -6.69% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -6.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJFG and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PJFG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJFG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJFG
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
PJFG
QQQ
Communication Services
PJFG
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
PJFG
QQQ
Healthcare
PJFG
QQQ
Industrials
PJFG
QQQ
Financial Services
PJFG
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
PJFG
QQQ
Utilities
PJFG
QQQ
Basic Materials
PJFG
-
QQQ
Energy
PJFG
-
QQQ
Real Estate
PJFG
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJFG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
PJFG
QQQ
PJFG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJFG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 2.73 | -1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 3.55 | -1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.47 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.71 | -2.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 14.30 | -10.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJFG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 2.73 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.41 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
PJFG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJFG drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJFG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -82.97% | +58.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.00% | -11.96% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.24% | -22.77% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | 0.00% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -32.79% | +29.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 3.11% | +2.93% |
Volatility
PJFG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is 4.01%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that PJFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJFG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 4.48% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 12.11% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 15.95% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 22.39% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 22.30% | -1.43% |
PJFG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJFG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PJFG and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to PJFG (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFG dropped -24.24% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.89% vs 24.62% for PJFG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PJFG has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFG.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for PJFG.
PJFG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PJFG and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJFG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer