PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFV vs. PFRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJFV vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFV achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than PFRL's 1.96% return.


PJFV

1D
0.17%
1M
4.27%
YTD
15.15%
6M
15.46%
1Y
35.20%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
10Y*

PFRL

1D
0.09%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.96%
6M
2.91%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFV vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PJFV
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
15.15%18.65%24.13%18.52%-2.19%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
1.96%6.25%9.40%13.75%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFV and PFRL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022

0.39

PJFV vs. PFRL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJFV
PFRL

Industrials

20.6%
97.9%

Financial Services

16.9%

-

Technology

15.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Energy

9.1%
11.9%

Healthcare

7.7%

-

Utilities

7.6%

-

Communication Services

7.1%
88.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PJFV
20.6%
PFRL
97.9%

Financial Services

PJFV
16.9%
PFRL

-

Technology

PJFV
15.7%
PFRL

-

Consumer Cyclical

PJFV
9.8%
PFRL

-

Energy

PJFV
9.1%
PFRL
11.9%

Healthcare

PJFV
7.7%
PFRL

-

Utilities

PJFV
7.6%
PFRL

-

Communication Services

PJFV
7.1%
PFRL
88.1%

Consumer Defensive

PJFV
4.5%
PFRL

-

Basic Materials

PJFV
1.0%
PFRL

-

Real Estate

PJFV

-

PFRL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJFV vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFV
PJFV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PJFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFV vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFVPFRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.73

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

5.17

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.72

17.58

+3.14

PJFV vs. PFRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the PFRL Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFV and PFRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFVPFRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

3.35

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

1.67

-0.13

Drawdowns

PJFV vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFV drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than PFRL's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFV and PFRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFVPFRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-8.83%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-1.25%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.15%

-8.83%

-9.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-0.44%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

0.37%

+1.33%

Volatility

PJFV vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) at 0.42%. This indicates that PJFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJFVPFRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

0.42%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

1.58%

+8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

1.94%

+10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

4.86%

+9.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

4.86%

+9.26%

PJFV vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJFV vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison

PJFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than PFRL's 6.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
6.83%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%
PJFV
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
0.59%0.68%1.31%1.20%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJFV and PFRL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJFV has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to PFRL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFV dropped -18.15% vs PFRL's -8.83%.

On 3-year performance, PJFV leads with 24.56% vs 8.85% for PFRL. On fees, PFRL is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, PFRL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PJFV has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFRL is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFV.

PFRL has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.59% for PJFV.

PJFV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PFRL is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PJFV and 0.72% for PFRL.

PFRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJFV and PFRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer