PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFG vs. PTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJFG vs. PTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJFG vs. PTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
-11.44%16.94%31.59%54.23%-6.69%
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
-0.10%7.63%2.67%7.71%-2.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFG achieves a -11.44% return, which is significantly lower than PTRB's -0.10% return.


PJFG

1D
1.15%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-11.44%
6M
-11.13%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
10Y*

PTRB

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJFG vs. PTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PTRB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJFG vs. PTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFG
PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PTRB
PTRB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFG vs. PTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFGPTRBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.96

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

1.36

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

1.51

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.78

4.49

-1.70

PJFG vs. PTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the PTRB Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFG and PTRB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFGPTRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.96

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.04

+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between PJFG and PTRB is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PJFG vs. PTRB - Dividend Comparison

PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%.


TTM20252024202320222021
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
4.76%4.73%5.10%4.62%4.07%0.12%

Drawdowns

PJFG vs. PTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFG drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, which is greater than PTRB's maximum drawdown of -19.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFG and PTRB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFGPTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-19.17%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.00%

-3.14%

-15.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.03%

-2.04%

-12.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-7.88%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

1.05%

+4.65%

Volatility

PJFG vs. PTRB - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) at 1.76%. This indicates that PJFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJFGPTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

1.76%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

2.63%

+10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

4.63%

+18.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

6.32%

+14.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

6.32%

+14.74%