PTRB vs. HCRB
PTRB (PGIM Total Return Bond ETF) and HCRB (Hartford Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTRB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by PGIM, while HCRB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTRB returned 4.94%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for HCRB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTRB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HCRB.
Performance
PTRB vs. HCRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTRB achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than HCRB's -0.11% return.
PTRB
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCRB
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PTRB vs. HCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF | -0.08% | 7.63% | 2.67% | 7.71% | -14.82% | -0.15% |
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF | -0.11% | 7.06% | 2.23% | 6.98% | -14.61% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTRB and HCRB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between PTRB and HCRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTRB vs. HCRB — Risk / Return Rank
PTRB
HCRB
PTRB vs. HCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTRB | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.61 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 4.82 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTRB | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.12 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
PTRB vs. HCRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, roughly equal to the maximum HCRB drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRB and HCRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTRB | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -19.90% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -2.82% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.52% | -6.18% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -2.14% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -7.01% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.94% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PTRB vs. HCRB - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) at 1.31%. This indicates that PTRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTRB | HCRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 1.31% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 2.74% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.80% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.25% | 6.12% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.25% | 5.95% | +0.30% |
PTRB vs. HCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTRB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HCRB's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTRB vs. HCRB - Dividend Comparison
PTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than HCRB's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF | 4.20% | 4.12% | 4.15% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 1.47% | 1.81% |
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.73% | 5.10% | 4.62% | 4.07% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PTRB and HCRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PTRB has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to HCRB (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTRB dropped -19.17% vs HCRB's -19.90%.
On 3-year performance, PTRB leads with 4.94% vs 4.28% for HCRB. On fees, HCRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PTRB has performed better with a 4.94% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HCRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PTRB.
PTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.20% for HCRB.
PTRB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while HCRB is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PTRB and 0.29% for HCRB.
PTRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTRB and HCRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer