PTRB vs. PDBAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX).

PTRB is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 2, 2021. PDBAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 10, 1995.

Performance

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF	-0.15%	7.63%	2.67%	7.71%	-14.82%	-0.15%
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund	-0.65%	7.50%	1.82%	6.51%	-14.52%	0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTRB achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than PDBAX's -0.65% return.

PTRB

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: -0.15%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PDBAX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: -0.65%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: 2.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTRB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBAX's 0.76% expense ratio.

PDBAX

PGIM Total Return Bond Fund

PTRB

PGIM Total Return Bond ETF

Return for Risk

PTRB vs. PDBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTRB

PTRB Risk / Return Rank: 54
PTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

PDBAX

PDBAX Risk / Return Rank: 51
PDBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PDBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PDBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PDBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PDBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTRB	PDBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	0.98	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.40	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.17	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.62	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	4.72	-0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the PDBAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTRB and PDBAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTRB	PDBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	0.98	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	1.09	-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between PTRB and PDBAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Dividend Comparison

PTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than PDBAX's 3.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF	5.18%	4.73%	5.10%	4.62%	4.07%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund	3.95%	4.27%	3.76%	3.55%	5.49%	2.47%	2.68%	10.32%	3.74%	2.60%	3.65%	2.94%

Drawdowns

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, smaller than the maximum PDBAX drawdown of -21.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRB and PDBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTRB	PDBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.17%	-21.24%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.14%	-3.07%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-2.75%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.88%	-2.48%	-5.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.06%	-0.01%

Volatility

PTRB vs. PDBAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) at 1.63%. This indicates that PTRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTRB	PDBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.76%	1.63%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.64%	2.70%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.64%	4.59%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.32%	5.99%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	5.32%	+1.00%