PIT vs. FLKR
PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck, while FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. PIT is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PIT returned 19.64%/yr vs 35.68%/yr for FLKR. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PIT charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
PIT vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 39.56% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 61.37% return.
PIT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 25.04%
- YTD
- 39.56%
- 1Y
- 54.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.95%
FLKR
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -15.74%
- 6M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 117.49%
- 3Y*
- 35.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.49M | $47.84M | $51.57M | |
| $1.38M | $2.80M | $3.76M |
PIT vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 39.56% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 1.67% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 61.37% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIT and FLKR is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between PIT and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIT vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
PIT
FLKR
PIT vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIT | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.46 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.87 | 12.27 | -1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIT vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIT | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -50.06% | +32.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -34.17% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.20% | -34.17% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.78% | -28.42% | +22.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -21.96% | +17.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 9.61% | -4.56% |
Volatility
PIT vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) is 6.47%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.39%. This indicates that PIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIT | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 21.39% | -14.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.93% | 50.33% | -30.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.30% | 53.42% | -31.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 32.16% | -14.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 29.79% | -12.09% |
PIT vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIT vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than FLKR's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.86% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 6.39% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIT and FLKR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to PIT (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIT dropped -17.20% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 3-year performance, FLKR leads with 35.68% vs 19.64% for PIT. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 6.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 35.68% return vs 19.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 2.86% for FLKR.
PIT is categorized as Commodities, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PIT and 0.09% for FLKR.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIT and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer