PIPR vs. MS
PIPR (Piper Sandler Companies) and MS (Morgan Stanley) are both stocks. Both operate in the Capital Markets industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, PIPR returned 26.97%/yr vs 27.71%/yr for MS. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PIPR vs. MS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPR achieves a -4.90% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 21.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PIPR having a 26.97% annualized return and MS not far ahead at 27.71%.
PIPR
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -4.90%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 34.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.04%
- 10Y*
- 26.97%
MS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 11.18%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 69.28%
- 3Y*
- 38.69%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- 27.71%
PIPR vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | -4.90% | 15.52% | 74.24% | 37.78% | -23.41% | 85.33% | 29.64% | 23.88% | -20.69% | 21.22% |
MS Morgan Stanley | 21.88% | 45.16% | 39.73% | 13.93% | -10.34% | 46.65% | 38.09% | 32.67% | -22.76% | 26.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPR and MS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PIPR and MS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PIPR:
$5.63B
MS:
$340.97B
PIPR:
$3.96
MS:
$11.41
PIPR:
19.97
MS:
18.75
PIPR:
1.32
MS:
1.76
PIPR:
2.81
MS:
2.84
PIPR:
4.20
MS:
3.26
PIPR:
$2.00B
MS:
$120.22B
PIPR:
$1.95B
MS:
$69.72B
PIPR:
$455.82M
MS:
$27.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPR vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank
PIPR
MS
PIPR vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIPR | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 3.53 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | 11.65 | -9.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIPR vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPR drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPR and MS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPR | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.97% | -88.12% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.56% | -18.83% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.78% | -29.24% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.30% | -32.38% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.02% | -51.33% | -11.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.55% | -1.94% | -12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.60% | -33.69% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | 5.70% | +4.68% |
Volatility
PIPR vs. MS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is 8.01%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that PIPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPR | MS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.01% | 8.62% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.83% | 21.46% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.44% | 25.81% | +8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.28% | 28.75% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.67% | 31.51% | +5.16% |
Dividends
PIPR vs. MS - Dividend Comparison
PIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than MS's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 1.87% | 2.17% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% |
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 2.50% | 1.68% | 1.17% | 2.09% | 5.30% | 3.81% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 4.74% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PIPR vs. MS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piper Sandler Companies and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PIPR vs. MS - Profitability Comparison
PIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a gross profit of 456.39M and revenue of 475.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
MS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.
PIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported an operating income of 88.67M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
MS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
PIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a net income of 65.24M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.
MS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPR and MS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MS has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to PIPR (8.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPR dropped -76.97% vs MS's -88.12%.
MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPR and MS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer