PINK vs. XLVI
PINK (Simplify Health Care ETF) and XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PINK is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PINK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLVI.
Performance
PINK vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than XLVI's 3.87% return.
PINK
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PINK vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 5.21% | 23.86% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 3.87% | 12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PINK and XLVI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.67 |
PINK vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PINK
XLVI
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PINK
XLVI
Industrials
PINK
XLVI
-
Financial Services
PINK
XLVI
Basic Materials
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Communication Services
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Cyclical
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Defensive
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Energy
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Real Estate
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Technology
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Utilities
PINK
-
XLVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PINK vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank
PINK
XLVI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PINK vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PINK | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PINK vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and XLVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PINK | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -8.14% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -1.93% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.62% | — | — |
Volatility
PINK vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PINK | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 11.05% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 11.05% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 11.05% | +6.53% |
PINK vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PINK vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison
PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than XLVI's 11.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.32% | 0.94% | 0.42% | 0.04% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.02% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PINK and XLVI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PINK.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.02%, compared with 0.65% for PINK.
PINK is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PINK and 0.35% for XLVI.
Find the right allocation for PINK and XLVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer