PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PINE vs. HRZN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PINEHRZN
YTD Return11.48%-21.69%
1Y Return25.57%-13.41%
3Y Return (Ann)5.10%-10.51%
Sharpe Ratio1.18-0.67
Sortino Ratio1.83-0.77
Omega Ratio1.220.90
Calmar Ratio1.18-0.39
Martin Ratio3.80-1.13
Ulcer Index7.28%11.10%
Daily Std Dev23.48%18.82%
Max Drawdown-60.00%-60.46%
Current Drawdown-4.74%-31.18%

Fundamentals


PINEHRZN
Market Cap$277.70M$357.41M
EPS$0.23-$0.15
Total Revenue (TTM)$49.49M$90.34M
Gross Profit (TTM)$32.58M$76.02M
EBITDA (TTM)$38.49M$24.89M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between PINE and HRZN is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

PINE vs. HRZN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PINE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than HRZN's -21.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.22%
-16.26%
PINE
HRZN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PINE vs. HRZN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PINE, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PINE, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PINE, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PINE, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PINE, currently valued at 3.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.80
HRZN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HRZN, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HRZN, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HRZN, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.90
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HRZN, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HRZN, currently valued at -1.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.13

PINE vs. HRZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the HRZN Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINE and HRZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.18
-0.67
PINE
HRZN

Dividends

PINE vs. HRZN - Dividend Comparison

PINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than HRZN's 14.06% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
6.17%6.51%5.71%5.06%5.47%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
14.06%10.02%10.43%7.54%9.44%9.28%10.67%10.70%12.96%11.76%9.86%9.71%

Drawdowns

PINE vs. HRZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINE drawdown since its inception was -60.00%, roughly equal to the maximum HRZN drawdown of -60.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINE and HRZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.74%
-31.18%
PINE
HRZN

Volatility

PINE vs. HRZN - Volatility Comparison

Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) at 6.82%. This indicates that PINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.63%
6.82%
PINE
HRZN

Financials

PINE vs. HRZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items