PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINE vs. FCPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PINE vs. FCPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINE achieves a 20.45% return, which is significantly higher than FCPT's 9.88% return.


PINE

1D
1.40%
1M
2.77%
YTD
20.45%
6M
23.86%
1Y
36.70%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*

FCPT

1D
2.25%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.61%
1Y
-4.97%
3Y*
5.71%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINE vs. FCPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
20.45%6.97%6.13%-5.46%0.95%41.19%-15.69%0.47%
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
9.88%-10.14%13.14%3.10%-7.20%3.42%12.37%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PINE and FCPT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2019

0.44

The correlation between PINE and FCPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PINE:

$327.49M

FCPT:

$2.73B

EPS

PINE:

-$0.03

FCPT:

$1.11

PS Ratio

PINE:

4.76

FCPT:

8.68

PB Ratio

PINE:

0.98

FCPT:

1.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

PINE:

$64.73M

FCPT:

$300.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PINE:

-$2.68M

FCPT:

$294.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

PINE:

$44.14M

FCPT:

$204.98M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINE vs. FCPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINE
PINE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPT
FCPT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FCPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINE vs. FCPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PINEFCPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.97

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

-0.34

+3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

-0.66

+8.01

PINE vs. FCPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINE Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the FCPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINE and FCPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PINE vs. FCPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINE drawdown since its inception was -60.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPT drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINE and FCPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINEFCPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.00%

-57.60%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-14.66%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-23.97%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

-25.96%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-10.29%

+7.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-8.28%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

8.35%

-3.28%

Volatility

PINE vs. FCPT - Volatility Comparison

Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) at 6.78%. This indicates that PINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINEFCPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

6.78%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

13.18%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

17.60%

+4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

19.96%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.14%

30.77%

+8.37%

Dividends

PINE vs. FCPT - Dividend Comparison

PINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than FCPT's 5.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
5.78%6.21%5.12%5.40%5.16%4.37%5.16%4.08%3.15%3.90%45.27%
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
5.99%6.82%6.61%6.51%5.71%5.06%5.47%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PINE vs. FCPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
18.41M
78.17M
(PINE) Total Revenue
(FCPT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PINE vs. FCPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%20222023202420252026
87.5%
95.7%
Portfolio components
PINE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.10M and revenue of 18.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.5%.

FCPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 74.79M and revenue of 78.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.7%.

PINE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.62M and revenue of 18.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

FCPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 43.24M and revenue of 78.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.3%.

PINE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 1.06M and revenue of 18.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

FCPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 30.33M and revenue of 78.17M, resulting in a net margin of 38.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PINE and FCPT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINE has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to FCPT (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINE dropped -60.00% vs FCPT's -57.60%.

PINE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINE and FCPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer