PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PINE vs. PECO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PINE and PECO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

PINE vs. PECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.27%
4.19%
PINE
PECO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PINE:

0.76

PECO:

0.31

Sortino Ratio

PINE:

1.21

PECO:

0.56

Omega Ratio

PINE:

1.15

PECO:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

PINE:

0.71

PECO:

0.37

Martin Ratio

PINE:

3.53

PECO:

0.96

Ulcer Index

PINE:

4.69%

PECO:

6.04%

Daily Std Dev

PINE:

21.88%

PECO:

18.63%

Max Drawdown

PINE:

-60.00%

PECO:

-23.11%

Current Drawdown

PINE:

-8.29%

PECO:

-9.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PINE:

$263.76M

PECO:

$4.88B

EPS

PINE:

$0.23

PECO:

$0.47

PE Ratio

PINE:

73.83

PECO:

76.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

PINE:

$38.44M

PECO:

$490.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PINE:

$23.37M

PECO:

$229.99M

EBITDA (TTM)

PINE:

$31.15M

PECO:

$314.89M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINE achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than PECO's -4.18% return.


PINE

YTD

1.13%

1M

3.10%

6M

4.26%

1Y

16.34%

5Y*

3.85%

10Y*

N/A

PECO

YTD

-4.18%

1M

-6.06%

6M

4.19%

1Y

4.84%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PINE vs. PECO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PINE is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PINE is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PINE is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PINE is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PINE is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PINE is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PECO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PECO is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PECO is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PECO is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PECO is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PECO is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PECO is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PINE vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PINE, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.760.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for PINE, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.210.56
The chart of Omega ratio for PINE, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.151.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for PINE, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.710.37
The chart of Martin ratio for PINE, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.530.96
PINE
PECO

The current PINE Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINE and PECO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.76
0.31
PINE
PECO

Dividends

PINE vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison

PINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than PECO's 3.34% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
6.54%6.61%6.51%5.71%5.06%5.47%0.30%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.34%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PINE vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINE drawdown since its inception was -60.00%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINE and PECO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.29%
-9.58%
PINE
PECO

Volatility

PINE vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison

Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 6.18%. This indicates that PINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.70%
6.18%
PINE
PECO

Financials

PINE vs. PECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab