PortfoliosLab logo
HRZN vs. PECO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HRZN and PECO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HRZN vs. PECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HRZN:

-0.93

PECO:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

HRZN:

-1.15

PECO:

1.23

Omega Ratio

HRZN:

0.80

PECO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

HRZN:

-0.67

PECO:

0.97

Martin Ratio

HRZN:

-1.62

PECO:

2.52

Ulcer Index

HRZN:

17.89%

PECO:

6.07%

Daily Std Dev

HRZN:

29.86%

PECO:

19.34%

Max Drawdown

HRZN:

-60.44%

PECO:

-23.11%

Current Drawdown

HRZN:

-41.44%

PECO:

-7.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HRZN:

$295.00M

PECO:

$5.02B

EPS

HRZN:

-$0.95

PECO:

$0.58

PS Ratio

HRZN:

3.00

PECO:

7.40

PB Ratio

HRZN:

1.00

PECO:

1.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

HRZN:

$66.62M

PECO:

$678.99M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HRZN:

$59.77M

PECO:

$421.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

HRZN:

$14.03M

PECO:

$434.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRZN achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than PECO's -1.75% return.


HRZN

YTD

-13.39%

1M

-11.59%

6M

-14.07%

1Y

-27.60%

5Y*

3.85%

10Y*

4.05%

PECO

YTD

-1.75%

1M

0.56%

6M

-5.40%

1Y

15.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HRZN vs. PECO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRZN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRZN is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRZN is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRZN is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRZN is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRZN is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRZN is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PECO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PECO is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PECO is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PECO is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PECO is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PECO is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PECO is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HRZN vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HRZN Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRZN and PECO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HRZN vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison

HRZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.06%, more than PECO's 3.35% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
18.06%14.68%10.02%10.43%7.54%9.44%9.28%10.67%10.70%12.96%11.76%9.86%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.35%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HRZN vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRZN drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRZN and PECO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HRZN vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a higher volatility of 20.61% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 6.23%. This indicates that HRZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HRZN vs. PECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
24.52M
178.31M
(HRZN) Total Revenue
(PECO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HRZN vs. PECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
71.4%
(HRZN) Gross Margin
(PECO) Gross Margin
HRZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 24.52M and revenue of 24.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.30M and revenue of 178.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

HRZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 22.96M and revenue of 24.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 93.6%.

PECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.94M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.

HRZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a net income of 11.10M and revenue of 24.52M, resulting in a net margin of 45.3%.

PECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 26.31M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.