HRZN vs. PECO

In the year-to-date period, HRZN achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly higher than PECO's -5.27% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HRZN Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRZN and PECO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HRZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.09%, more than PECO's 3.45% yield.

The maximum HRZN drawdown since its inception was -60.45%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRZN and PECO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 8.89%. This indicates that HRZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.