PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRZN vs. PECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HRZN vs. PECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRZN achieves a -19.44% return, which is significantly lower than PECO's 19.49% return.


HRZN

1D
3.37%
1M
20.26%
YTD
-19.44%
6M
-17.65%
1Y
-21.91%
3Y*
-14.02%
5Y*
-12.48%
10Y*
2.38%

PECO

1D
1.70%
1M
3.97%
YTD
19.49%
6M
19.42%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRZN vs. PECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
-19.44%-14.44%-22.87%26.99%-19.72%-6.04%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
19.49%-1.59%6.20%18.53%-0.33%19.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HRZN and PECO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.27

The correlation between HRZN and PECO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HRZN:

$0.63

PECO:

$1.15

PE Ratio

HRZN:

6.78

PECO:

36.48

PEG Ratio

HRZN:

0.14

PECO:

0.53

PS Ratio

HRZN:

3.58

PECO:

5.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

HRZN:

$53.12M

PECO:

$739.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HRZN:

$47.15M

PECO:

$525.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

HRZN:

$51.20M

PECO:

$502.64M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRZN vs. PECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRZN
HRZN Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HRZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRZN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HRZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRZN Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PECO
PECO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PECO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PECO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRZN vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRZNPECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.22

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

2.66

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

6.22

-7.05

HRZN vs. PECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRZN Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRZN and PECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRZN vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRZN drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRZN and PECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRZNPECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-23.11%

-39.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.88%

-7.74%

-39.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.36%

-15.78%

-43.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.69%

-0.20%

-52.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.42%

-6.45%

-6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.33%

3.49%

+22.84%

Volatility

HRZN vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a higher volatility of 18.40% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 6.46%. This indicates that HRZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRZNPECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.40%

6.46%

+11.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.40%

11.42%

+29.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.87%

16.01%

+27.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.92%

22.59%

+9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.69%

22.59%

+14.10%

Dividends

HRZN vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison

HRZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.83%, more than PECO's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
35.83%20.47%15.24%10.40%10.86%7.85%9.44%9.28%10.67%10.70%12.96%11.76%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.08%3.52%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HRZN vs. PECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
24.08M
190.74M
(HRZN) Total Revenue
(PECO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HRZN vs. PECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
71.1%
Portfolio components
HRZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 24.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 135.68M and revenue of 190.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.

HRZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 24.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.21M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.

HRZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a net income of 9.24M and revenue of 24.08M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.

PECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.38M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HRZN and PECO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRZN has higher volatility (18.40%) compared to PECO (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRZN dropped -62.57% vs PECO's -23.11%.

PECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRZN and PECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer