PINE vs. CUZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ).

Performance

PINE vs. CUZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PINE vs. CUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PINE Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.	9.37%	6.97%	6.13%	-5.46%	0.95%	41.19%	-15.69%	0.47%
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated	-11.36%	-12.14%	32.57%	2.02%	-34.67%	23.30%	-14.76%	3.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PINE : $279.95M CUZ : $3.78B
EPS PINE : -$0.21 CUZ : $0.26
PS Ratio PINE : 4.60 CUZ : 5.14
PB Ratio PINE : 0.93 CUZ : 0.80
Total Revenue (TTM) PINE : $60.53M CUZ : $739.94M
Gross Profit (TTM) PINE : $51.49M CUZ : $507.42M
EBITDA (TTM) PINE : $43.33M CUZ : $576.67M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINE achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than CUZ's -11.36% return.

PINE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -7.27%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 31.18%
• 1Y: 15.40%
• 3Y*: 9.43%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: —

CUZ

• 1D: 3.58%
• 1M: -2.55%
• YTD: -11.36%
• 6M: -20.15%
• 1Y: -19.95%
• 3Y*: 7.15%
• 5Y*: -4.64%
• 10Y*: 0.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PINE vs. CUZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINE

PINE Risk / Return Rank: 60
PINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PINE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PINE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

CUZ

CUZ Risk / Return Rank: 12
CUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINE vs. CUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PINE	CUZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	-0.73	+1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	-0.89	+2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.89	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	-0.72	+1.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	-1.64	+3.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PINE vs. CUZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINE Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the CUZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINE and CUZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PINE	CUZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69	-0.73	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	-0.16	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.13	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between PINE and CUZ is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PINE vs. CUZ - Dividend Comparison

PINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than CUZ's 5.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PINE Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.	6.42%	6.82%	6.61%	6.51%	5.71%	5.06%	5.47%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated	5.67%	4.97%	4.18%	5.26%	5.02%	2.31%	4.45%	2.74%	2.47%	3.24%	27.10%	3.39%

Drawdowns

PINE vs. CUZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINE drawdown since its inception was -60.00%, smaller than the maximum CUZ drawdown of -82.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINE and CUZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINE	CUZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.00%	-82.87%	+22.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.13%	-27.66%	+7.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.68%	-54.28%	+27.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.93%	-62.19%	+51.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.44%	-35.34%	+22.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.99%	12.21%	-2.22%

Volatility

PINE vs. CUZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) is 6.09%, while Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that PINE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PINE	CUZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	9.86%	-3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	20.81%	-4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.52%	27.50%	-4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.11%	28.80%	-4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.58%	30.03%	+9.55%

Financials

PINE vs. CUZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. and Cousins Properties Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PINE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.97M and revenue of 16.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.6%.

CUZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PINE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.96M and revenue of 16.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.3%.

CUZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PINE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 921.00K and revenue of 16.90M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

CUZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a net income of -190.00K and revenue of 1.16M, resulting in a net margin of -16.4%.