PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRZN vs. FDUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

HRZN vs. FDUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) and Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HRZN vs. FDUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
-31.54%-14.44%-22.87%26.99%-19.72%29.74%14.08%26.88%11.71%18.62%
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
-7.07%2.08%20.55%20.02%17.09%50.66%-0.78%40.72%-13.70%6.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HRZN:

$178.29M

FDUS:

$643.98M

EPS

HRZN:

$1.05

FDUS:

$2.33

PE Ratio

HRZN:

3.99

FDUS:

7.48

PS Ratio

HRZN:

4.37

FDUS:

4.96

PB Ratio

HRZN:

0.56

FDUS:

0.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

HRZN:

$41.52M

FDUS:

$126.37M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HRZN:

-$3.93M

FDUS:

$75.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

HRZN:

-$10.37M

FDUS:

$66.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRZN achieves a -31.54% return, which is significantly lower than FDUS's -7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HRZN has underperformed FDUS with an annualized return of 1.09%, while FDUS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


HRZN

1D
2.93%
1M
-28.31%
YTD
-31.54%
6M
-23.74%
1Y
-46.04%
3Y*
-16.90%
5Y*
-11.87%
10Y*
1.09%

FDUS

1D
1.34%
1M
1.27%
YTD
-7.07%
6M
-9.16%
1Y
-4.71%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRZN vs. FDUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRZN
HRZN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HRZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRZN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HRZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRZN Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FDUS
FDUS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRZN vs. FDUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) and Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRZNFDUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.11

-0.21

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.44

-0.13

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.98

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.33

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.97

-0.74

-1.22

HRZN vs. FDUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRZN Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the FDUS Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRZN and FDUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRZNFDUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.11

-0.21

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

0.74

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.39

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.38

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between HRZN and FDUS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HRZN vs. FDUS - Dividend Comparison

HRZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.17%, more than FDUS's 12.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
30.17%20.47%15.24%10.40%10.86%7.85%9.44%9.28%10.67%10.70%12.96%11.76%
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
12.23%11.14%11.51%14.63%10.51%8.90%10.15%10.78%13.69%10.54%10.17%11.69%

Drawdowns

HRZN vs. FDUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRZN drawdown since its inception was -61.42%, smaller than the maximum FDUS drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRZN and FDUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HRZNFDUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.42%

-68.76%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.49%

-16.45%

-32.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.42%

-23.94%

-37.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.42%

-68.76%

+7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.80%

-14.68%

-45.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-8.90%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.41%

7.39%

+16.02%

Volatility

HRZN vs. FDUS - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a higher volatility of 30.32% compared to Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) at 7.64%. This indicates that HRZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HRZNFDUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.32%

7.64%

+22.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.98%

14.72%

+20.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.59%

22.87%

+18.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.51%

19.66%

+10.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.80%

33.49%

+2.31%

Financials

HRZN vs. FDUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Horizon Technology Finance Corporation and Fidus Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
20.67M
30.88M
(HRZN) Total Revenue
(FDUS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items