PIMIX vs. GLTR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PIMIX (PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class) and GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both funds - PIMIX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. PIMIX is actively managed, while GLTR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIMIX returned 4.61%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIMIX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.

Performance

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIMIX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PIMIX has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 4.61%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.

PIMIX

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 7.90%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: 3.34%
• 10Y*: 4.61%

GLTR

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -11.67%
• YTD: -3.01%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 45.14%
• 3Y*: 30.24%
• 5Y*: 14.39%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class	0.25%	11.08%	5.45%	9.36%	-9.07%	2.62%	5.84%	8.10%	0.63%	8.63%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	-3.01%	87.25%	20.63%	2.01%	-0.25%	-9.60%	29.52%	20.96%	-2.85%	12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PIMIX and GLTR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010	0.21

The correlation between PIMIX and GLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PIMIX vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIMIX

PIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
PIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
PIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 34
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PIMIX	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.19	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.52	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	1.51	+0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	3.41	+3.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIMIX and GLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PIMIX	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	1.19	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.61	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	0.60	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.56	0.31	+1.25

Drawdowns

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIMIX drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIMIX and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIMIX	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.39%	-55.70%	+42.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.69%	-30.10%	+26.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.84%	-30.10%	+26.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.34%	-30.10%	+16.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.39%	-30.10%	+16.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-30.08%	+28.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-28.83%	+27.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	13.25%	-12.18%

Volatility

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) is 1.69%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that PIMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIMIX	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	9.50%	-7.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.33%	35.83%	-32.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.19%	38.04%	-33.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.85%	23.75%	-18.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.25%	20.57%	-16.32%

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIMIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIMIX vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

PIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PIMIX PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class	5.87%	6.01%	6.27%	6.21%	4.98%	4.02%	4.88%	5.83%	5.66%	5.37%	5.52%	7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIMIX and GLTR in my portfolio?

PIMIX and GLTR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIMIX or GLTR?

GLTR has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to PIMIX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIMIX dropped -13.39% vs GLTR's -55.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.