PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PILL vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PILL vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PILL achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -5.59% return.


PILL

1D
8.24%
1M
-11.70%
YTD
-1.69%
6M
7.86%
1Y
123.35%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
-10.52%
10Y*

TMF

1D
0.57%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-5.59%
6M
-9.73%
1Y
-3.14%
3Y*
-20.49%
5Y*
-30.44%
10Y*
-16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PILL vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PILL
Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares
-1.69%75.14%-7.26%-12.06%-43.16%-37.33%0.28%19.26%-21.15%16.39%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
-5.59%-2.94%-35.95%-13.01%-72.60%-19.80%39.02%34.75%-11.01%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PILL and TMF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2017

-0.03

The correlation between PILL and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PILL vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PILL
TMF

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

18.7%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PILL
100.0%
TMF

-

Basic Materials

PILL

-

TMF

-

Communication Services

PILL

-

TMF

-

Consumer Cyclical

PILL

-

TMF

-

Consumer Defensive

PILL

-

TMF

-

Energy

PILL

-

TMF

-

Financial Services

PILL

-

TMF
18.7%

Industrials

PILL

-

TMF

-

Real Estate

PILL

-

TMF

-

Technology

PILL

-

TMF

-

Utilities

PILL

-

TMF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PILL vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PILL
PILL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PILL Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PILL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PILL vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PILLTMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.00

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

-0.12

+3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

-0.27

+12.51

PILL vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PILL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PILL and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PILLTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

-0.11

+2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.65

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.13

+0.03

Drawdowns

PILL vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PILL drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, roughly equal to the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PILL and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PILLTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.76%

-92.89%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.21%

-26.51%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.43%

-56.31%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.38%

-88.81%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.31%

-92.18%

+25.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.54%

-43.64%

-14.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.12%

11.55%

-1.43%

Volatility

PILL vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) has a higher volatility of 22.02% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.99%. This indicates that PILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PILLTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.02%

7.99%

+14.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.70%

19.02%

+29.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.21%

28.76%

+33.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.53%

46.72%

+13.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.83%

43.91%

+19.92%

PILL vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PILL has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PILL vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

PILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than TMF's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PILL
Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares
0.64%0.69%1.28%1.83%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.38%0.91%0.10%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.13%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


PILL and TMF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PILL has higher volatility (22.02%) compared to TMF (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PILL dropped -88.76% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 5-year performance, PILL leads with -10.52% vs -30.44% for TMF. On fees, PILL is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PILL has performed better with a -10.52% return vs -30.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PILL is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.64% for PILL.

PILL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. PILL tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PILL and 1.01% for TMF.

PILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PILL and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer