PILL vs. KURE
PILL (Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares) and KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PILL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while KURE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PILL returned -1.67%/yr vs -12.04%/yr for KURE. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PILL charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for KURE.
Performance
PILL vs. KURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PILL achieves a 53.57% return, which is significantly higher than KURE's 1.41% return.
PILL
- 1D
- -7.82%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 62.55%
- YTD
- 53.57%
- 1Y
- 244.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.36%
- 5Y*
- -1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.75%
KURE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- -7.37%
- 3Y*
- -0.53%
- 5Y*
- -12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $507.63K | $1.60M | $845.13K | |
| $1.07M | $1.58M | $1.17M |
PILL vs. KURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PILL Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares | 53.57% | 75.14% | -7.26% | -12.06% | -43.16% | -37.33% | 0.28% | 19.26% | -32.21% |
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 1.41% | 24.87% | -17.83% | -17.70% | -25.43% | -16.01% | 68.97% | 34.30% | -30.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PILL and KURE is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | 0.29 |
PILL vs. KURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PILL
KURE
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PILL
KURE
Basic Materials
PILL
-
KURE
-
Communication Services
PILL
-
KURE
-
Consumer Cyclical
PILL
-
KURE
-
Consumer Defensive
PILL
-
KURE
Energy
PILL
-
KURE
-
Financial Services
PILL
-
KURE
-
Industrials
PILL
-
KURE
-
Real Estate
PILL
-
KURE
-
Technology
PILL
-
KURE
-
Utilities
PILL
-
KURE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PILL vs. KURE — Risk / Return Rank
PILL
KURE
PILL vs. KURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PILL | KURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.97 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.71 | -0.27 | +7.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.14 | -0.52 | +25.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PILL vs. KURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PILL drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than KURE's maximum drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PILL and KURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PILL | KURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.76% | -68.53% | -20.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.21% | -30.88% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.43% | -34.05% | -26.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.00% | -63.97% | -18.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.38% | -55.84% | +8.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.40% | -38.43% | -19.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.17% | 16.07% | -5.90% |
Volatility
PILL vs. KURE - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) has a higher volatility of 24.20% compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) at 10.91%. This indicates that PILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PILL | KURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.20% | 10.91% | +13.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.16% | 20.85% | +30.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.62% | 28.26% | +37.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.99% | 31.46% | +29.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.02% | 32.44% | +31.58% |
PILL vs. KURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PILL has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than KURE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PILL vs. KURE - Dividend Comparison
PILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than KURE's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.14% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
PILL Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares | 0.36% | 0.69% | 1.28% | 1.83% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.91% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PILL and KURE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PILL has higher volatility (24.20%) compared to KURE (10.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PILL dropped -88.76% vs KURE's -68.53%.
On 5-year performance, PILL leads with -1.67% vs -12.04% for KURE. On fees, KURE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KURE has been the lower-risk option at 10.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PILL has performed better with a -1.67% return vs -12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KURE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PILL.
KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.36% for PILL.
PILL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KURE is China Equities. PILL tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PILL and 0.65% for KURE.
PILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PILL and KURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer