PIEL vs. JHID
PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and JHID (John Hancock International High Dividend ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. PIEL is passively managed, while JHID is actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PIEL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for JHID.
Performance
PIEL vs. JHID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than JHID's 17.13% return.
PIEL
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
JHID
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $54.92K | $31.93K | $30.69K | |
| $1.50K | $4.13K | $8.68K |
PIEL vs. JHID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 12.32% | -0.43% |
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 17.13% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIEL and JHID is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIEL vs. JHID — Risk / Return Rank
PIEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JHID
PIEL vs. JHID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIEL | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIEL vs. JHID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, which is greater than JHID's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and JHID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIEL | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -12.42% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -0.45% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -2.40% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility
PIEL vs. JHID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIEL | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 12.89% | +11.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 13.88% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 13.88% | +10.54% |
PIEL vs. JHID - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIEL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JHID's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIEL vs. JHID - Dividend Comparison
PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JHID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 3.35% | 3.13% | 5.15% | 5.23% |
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIEL and JHID have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JHID is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JHID is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PIEL.
JHID has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PIEL and 0.46% for JHID.
Find the right allocation for PIEL and JHID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer