PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHID vs. NVOH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHID vs. NVOH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) and Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHID achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than NVOH's -4.50% return.


JHID

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
14.14%
6M
14.56%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
10Y*

NVOH

1D
6.82%
1M
3.96%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
1.36%
1Y
-32.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHID vs. NVOH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JHID and NVOH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHID vs. NVOH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHID
JHID Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JHID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHID Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHID Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JHID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHID Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NVOH
NVOH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NVOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVOH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NVOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVOH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHID vs. NVOH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) and Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHIDNVOHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.90

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

-0.71

+4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

-1.13

+17.42

JHID vs. NVOH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHID Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the NVOH Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHID and NVOH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHID vs. NVOH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHID drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum NVOH drawdown of -61.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHID and NVOH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHIDNVOHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.42%

-61.60%

+49.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-46.22%

+37.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-49.74%

+49.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-38.69%

+36.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

32.05%

-29.88%

Volatility

JHID vs. NVOH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) is 3.95%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that JHID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVOH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHIDNVOHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

11.12%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

36.84%

-26.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.97%

49.73%

-36.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

48.86%

-34.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

48.86%

-34.92%

JHID vs. NVOH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHID has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than NVOH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHID vs. NVOH - Dividend Comparison

JHID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than NVOH's 6.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JHID
John Hancock International High Dividend ETF
2.85%3.13%5.15%5.23%
NVOH
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF
6.77%2.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHID and NVOH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVOH has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to JHID (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHID dropped -12.42% vs NVOH's -61.60%.

On 1-year performance, JHID leads with 35.19% vs -32.94% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, JHID has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHID has performed better with a 35.19% return vs -32.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for JHID.

NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 2.85% for JHID.

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for JHID and 0.19% for NVOH.

JHID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHID and NVOH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer