PIEL vs. IDOG
PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PIEL tracks the Pacer International Export Leaders Index while IDOG tracks the S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIEL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IDOG.
Performance
PIEL vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 11.05% return.
PIEL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDOG
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
PIEL vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 14.89% | -0.43% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 11.05% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIEL and IDOG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIEL vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
PIEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDOG
PIEL vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIEL | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIEL vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and IDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIEL | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -37.32% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -3.59% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -7.89% | +4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility
PIEL vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIEL | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.81% | 13.80% | +11.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 15.67% | +9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 17.08% | +7.73% |
PIEL vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIEL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIEL vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 4.43% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIEL and IDOG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PIEL.
IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.
PIEL tracks Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PIEL and 0.50% for IDOG.
Find the right allocation for PIEL and IDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer