PIEL vs. EPIN
PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. PIEL is passively managed, while EPIN is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PIEL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for EPIN.
Performance
PIEL vs. EPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than EPIN's 23.34% return.
PIEL
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EPIN
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- YTD
- 23.34%
- 1Y
- 38.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.81K | $24.58K | $20.32K | |
| $1.50K | $4.13K | $8.68K |
PIEL vs. EPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 12.32% | -0.43% |
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 23.34% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIEL and EPIN is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIEL vs. EPIN — Risk / Return Rank
PIEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EPIN
PIEL vs. EPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIEL | EPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIEL vs. EPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, which is greater than EPIN's maximum drawdown of -11.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and EPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIEL | EPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -11.64% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -2.49% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -1.93% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility
PIEL vs. EPIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIEL | EPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 19.13% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 18.37% | +6.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 18.37% | +6.05% |
PIEL vs. EPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIEL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EPIN's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIEL vs. EPIN - Dividend Comparison
PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 0.64% | 0.79% |
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PIEL and EPIN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PIEL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PIEL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.
EPIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PIEL and 0.80% for EPIN.
Find the right allocation for PIEL and EPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer