PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIEL vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIEL vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 16.92% return.


PIEL

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.18%
6M
9.81%
YTD
14.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
0.28%
1M
2.93%
6M
12.85%
YTD
16.92%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIEL vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PIEL and CALF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIEL vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIEL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIEL vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIELCALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.50

PIEL vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIEL vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIELCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.67%

-47.58%

+32.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-0.29%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-10.64%

+7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

Volatility

PIEL vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIELCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.81%

15.98%

+8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.81%

23.29%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

25.93%

-1.12%

PIEL vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIEL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIEL vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
1.17%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
PIEL
Pacer International Export Leaders ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIEL and CALF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PIEL.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.

PIEL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Value Equities. PIEL tracks Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PIEL and 0.59% for CALF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIEL and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer