PIE vs. QAT
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while QAT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIE returned 10.15%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for QAT. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.
Performance
PIE vs. QAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's -0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has outperformed QAT with an annualized return of 10.15%, while QAT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.
PIE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 39.11%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 70.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
QAT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
PIE vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 39.11% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | -0.42% | 8.81% | 5.20% | 2.72% | -7.23% | 14.42% | 6.94% | -0.44% | 20.03% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and QAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.30 |
PIE vs. QAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
QAT
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
QAT
Industrials
PIE
QAT
Financial Services
PIE
QAT
Energy
PIE
QAT
Healthcare
PIE
QAT
Real Estate
PIE
QAT
Basic Materials
PIE
QAT
Communication Services
PIE
QAT
Utilities
PIE
QAT
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
QAT
Consumer Defensive
PIE
QAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
QAT
PIE vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIE | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.04 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.18 | 0.17 | +7.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.52 | 0.33 | +23.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIE | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 0.14 | +3.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.25 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.07 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PIE vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than QAT's maximum drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and QAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -45.21% | -27.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -10.60% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -17.41% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -33.17% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -34.04% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -12.80% | +11.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -19.18% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 5.54% | -2.53% |
Volatility
PIE vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) at 5.03%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 5.03% | +3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.77% | 10.46% | +7.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 13.36% | +8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 15.00% | +5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 17.56% | +3.79% |
PIE vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than QAT's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.70% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 3.52% | 3.51% | 5.90% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 3.57% | 4.63% | 4.10% | 3.51% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and QAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to QAT (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs QAT's -45.21%.
On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.15% vs 4.31% for QAT. On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, QAT has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.70% for PIE.
PIE is categorized as Momentum, while QAT is Emerging Markets Equities. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.59% for QAT.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and QAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer