PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. QAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's -0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has outperformed QAT with an annualized return of 10.15%, while QAT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%

QAT

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.42%
6M
0.19%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIE vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
-0.42%8.81%5.20%2.72%-7.23%14.42%6.94%-0.44%20.03%-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and QAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.30

PIE vs. QAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIE
QAT

Technology

47.0%
0.5%

Industrials

16.8%
13.2%

Financial Services

14.4%
54.3%

Energy

5.4%
3.3%

Healthcare

5.1%
0.8%

Real Estate

3.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
12.7%

Communication Services

1.4%
6.7%

Utilities

1.3%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
0.7%

Technology

PIE
47.0%
QAT
0.5%

Industrials

PIE
16.8%
QAT
13.2%

Financial Services

PIE
14.4%
QAT
54.3%

Energy

PIE
5.4%
QAT
3.3%

Healthcare

PIE
5.1%
QAT
0.8%

Real Estate

PIE
3.6%
QAT
3.9%

Basic Materials

PIE
3.2%
QAT
12.7%

Communication Services

PIE
1.4%
QAT
6.7%

Utilities

PIE
1.3%
QAT
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PIE
1.3%
QAT
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

PIE
0.4%
QAT
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QAT
QAT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIE vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIEQATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.04

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

0.17

+7.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.52

0.33

+23.19

PIE vs. QAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the QAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and QAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIEQATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

0.14

+3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.23

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.25

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.07

+0.05

Drawdowns

PIE vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than QAT's maximum drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and QAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEQATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-45.21%

-27.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-10.60%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-17.41%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.32%

-33.17%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

-34.04%

-6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-12.80%

+11.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-19.18%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

5.54%

-2.53%

Volatility

PIE vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) at 5.03%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEQATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

5.03%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

10.46%

+7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.91%

13.36%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

15.00%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.35%

17.56%

+3.79%

PIE vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than QAT's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
3.52%3.51%5.90%3.92%4.78%2.33%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.51%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and QAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to QAT (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs QAT's -45.21%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.15% vs 4.31% for QAT. On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, QAT has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.70% for PIE.

PIE is categorized as Momentum, while QAT is Emerging Markets Equities. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.59% for QAT.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and QAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer