PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QAT vs. SJM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QAT and SJM is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

QAT vs. SJM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.53%
-9.57%
QAT
SJM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QAT:

0.59

SJM:

-0.82

Sortino Ratio

QAT:

0.90

SJM:

-1.12

Omega Ratio

QAT:

1.11

SJM:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

QAT:

0.25

SJM:

-0.56

Martin Ratio

QAT:

2.30

SJM:

-1.63

Ulcer Index

QAT:

3.32%

SJM:

11.65%

Daily Std Dev

QAT:

12.98%

SJM:

23.06%

Max Drawdown

QAT:

-45.22%

SJM:

-45.66%

Current Drawdown

QAT:

-20.11%

SJM:

-32.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAT achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than SJM's -7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, QAT has underperformed SJM with an annualized return of 1.57%, while SJM has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.


QAT

YTD

-0.73%

1M

0.06%

6M

5.33%

1Y

7.71%

5Y*

3.37%

10Y*

1.57%

SJM

YTD

-7.25%

1M

-7.05%

6M

-10.45%

1Y

-17.99%

5Y*

2.23%

10Y*

2.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QAT vs. SJM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QAT is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QAT is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QAT is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QAT is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QAT is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QAT is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SJM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SJM is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SJM is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SJM is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SJM is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SJM is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SJM is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QAT vs. SJM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QAT, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.59-0.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for QAT, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.90-1.12
The chart of Omega ratio for QAT, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.110.88
The chart of Calmar ratio for QAT, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.25-0.56
The chart of Martin ratio for QAT, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.30-1.63
QAT
SJM

The current QAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the SJM Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAT and SJM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.59
-0.82
QAT
SJM

Dividends

QAT vs. SJM - Dividend Comparison

QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than SJM's 4.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
5.94%5.90%3.93%4.78%2.34%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.52%4.49%0.00%
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
4.19%3.89%3.29%2.54%2.78%3.08%3.32%3.49%2.46%2.22%2.12%2.42%

Drawdowns

QAT vs. SJM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -45.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SJM drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and SJM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-20.11%
-32.83%
QAT
SJM

Volatility

QAT vs. SJM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) is 3.29%, while The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that QAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SJM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.29%
7.66%
QAT
SJM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab