PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PID vs. HAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PID vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than HAIL's 31.10% return.


PID

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.28%
YTD
5.45%
6M
6.61%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.80%

HAIL

1D
-2.34%
1M
16.87%
YTD
31.10%
6M
29.05%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
-5.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PID vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
5.45%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%25.87%-11.46%0.49%
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
31.10%19.62%-6.98%9.65%-45.72%1.95%84.33%30.63%-19.96%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PID and HAIL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.63

The correlation between PID and HAIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PID vs. HAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PID
HAIL

Financial Services

17.5%
1.9%

Utilities

14.2%

-

Communication Services

13.8%
4.9%

Energy

13.3%
4.4%

Technology

8.7%
33.1%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
34.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Financial Services

PID
17.5%
HAIL
1.9%

Utilities

PID
14.2%
HAIL

-

Communication Services

PID
13.8%
HAIL
4.9%

Energy

PID
13.3%
HAIL
4.4%

Technology

PID
8.7%
HAIL
33.1%

Healthcare

PID
8.4%
HAIL

-

Industrials

PID
7.9%
HAIL
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PID
6.4%
HAIL
34.2%

Consumer Defensive

PID
6.0%
HAIL

-

Basic Materials

PID
3.4%
HAIL
1.2%

Real Estate

PID
0.4%
HAIL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PID vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

HAIL
HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIDHAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.14

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

9.49

-2.13

PID vs. HAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the HAIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID and HAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIDHAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.00

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

-0.17

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.20

+0.07

Drawdowns

PID vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, roughly equal to the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and HAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIDHAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.34%

-65.98%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-18.64%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

-40.96%

+27.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-63.12%

+40.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-30.85%

+28.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.04%

-31.60%

+18.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

6.15%

-3.97%

Volatility

PID vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.75%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIDHAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

10.80%

-8.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

22.28%

-14.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.70%

29.32%

-19.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

31.80%

-17.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

31.73%

-13.89%

PID vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PID vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison

PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than HAIL's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
1.44%2.00%2.98%2.62%2.09%1.36%0.52%1.17%2.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.27%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PID and HAIL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAIL has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs HAIL's -65.98%.

On 5-year performance, PID leads with 8.28% vs -5.36% for HAIL. On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.28% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.44% for HAIL.

PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.45% for HAIL.

HAIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PID and HAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer