PHYD vs. LDRH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. PHYD is actively managed, while LDRH is passively managed. Over the past year, PHYD returned 7.97% vs 6.30% for LDRH. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHYD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.

Performance

PHYD vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than LDRH's 1.88% return.

PHYD

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 2.49%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 7.97%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRH

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYD vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -	2.49%	8.84%	0.18%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	1.88%	7.18%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYD and LDRH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024	0.78

The correlation between PHYD and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PHYD vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PHYD	LDRH
Technology	0.8%	-
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.7%	-
Industrials	0.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-
Energy	0.3%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	-

Return for Risk

PHYD vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYD

PHYD Risk / Return Rank: 80
PHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 85
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYD vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHYD	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.43	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	3.92	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.48	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	5.14	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.70	21.43	-5.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHYD vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYD and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHYD	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.43	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	1.70	+0.04

Drawdowns

PHYD vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYD drawdown since its inception was -4.33%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYD and LDRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHYD	LDRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-3.17%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.10%	-1.23%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.12%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-0.24%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.30%	+0.21%

Volatility

PHYD vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that PHYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHYD	LDRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	0.69%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.56%	1.97%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35%	2.61%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.59%	3.51%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.59%	3.51%	+1.08%

PHYD vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHYD vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

PHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than LDRH's 6.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	6.99%	6.41%	1.13%	0.00%
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -	9.02%	6.63%	6.80%	6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHYD and LDRH in my portfolio?

PHYD and LDRH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHYD or LDRH?

PHYD has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYD dropped -4.33% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

Which ETF is better, PHYD or LDRH?

On 1-year performance, PHYD leads with 7.97% vs 6.30% for LDRH. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PHYD or LDRH?

Over the 1-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PHYD or LDRH?

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PHYD or LDRH?

PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.02%, compared with 6.99% for LDRH.

What is the main difference between PHYD and LDRH?

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PHYD and 0.35% for LDRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.