LDRH vs. GHYB
LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) and GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - LDRH tracks the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index while GHYB tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LDRH returned 5.98% vs 6.43% for GHYB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LDRH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GHYB.
Performance
LDRH vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDRH achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than GHYB's 1.55% return.
LDRH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
LDRH vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 1.98% | 7.18% | 0.21% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.38% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDRH and GHYB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between LDRH and GHYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDRH vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank
LDRH
GHYB
LDRH vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDRH | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 2.41 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | 10.98 | +9.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDRH vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDRH drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRH and GHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDRH | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -21.48% | +18.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.23% | -2.67% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.10% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -2.55% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 0.59% | -0.29% |
Volatility
LDRH vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) is 0.61%, while Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) has a volatility of 0.93%. This indicates that LDRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDRH | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.93% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | 2.77% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 3.52% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 7.70% | -4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 8.26% | -4.78% |
LDRH vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDRH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDRH vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison
LDRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than GHYB's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.79% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 6.99% | 6.41% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDRH and GHYB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHYB has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to LDRH (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRH dropped -3.17% vs GHYB's -21.48%.
On 1-year performance, GHYB leads with 6.43% vs 5.98% for LDRH. On fees, GHYB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GHYB has performed better with a 6.43% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GHYB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for LDRH.
LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.79% for GHYB.
LDRH tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index, while GHYB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LDRH and 0.34% for GHYB.
LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDRH and GHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer