PHTUX vs. PLTZX
PHTUX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund) and PLTZX (Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Principal. Over the past 10 years, PHTUX returned 11.81%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for PLTZX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PHTUX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PLTZX.
Performance
PHTUX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHTUX achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZX's 9.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHTUX having a 11.81% annualized return and PLTZX not far behind at 11.62%.
PHTUX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
PLTZX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
PHTUX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTUX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund | 11.33% | 19.64% | 17.26% | 20.30% | -18.48% | 19.08% | 15.94% | 25.59% | -9.48% | 20.48% |
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund | 9.67% | 17.76% | 16.89% | 20.36% | -18.81% | 18.12% | 16.60% | 27.54% | -9.24% | 22.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHTUX and PLTZX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 0.99 |
The correlation between PHTUX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHTUX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank
PHTUX
PLTZX
PHTUX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHTUX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 2.68 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | 12.08 | +3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHTUX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.98 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.61 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.73 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.70 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PHTUX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHTUX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTUX and PLTZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHTUX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.76% | -34.01% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | -8.70% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | -15.73% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -26.79% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.76% | -34.01% | +2.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -4.63% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.93% | -0.09% |
Volatility
PHTUX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHTUX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.30% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 9.44% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.72% | 11.80% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 15.46% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 15.99% | -0.45% |
PHTUX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHTUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PHTUX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison
PHTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than PLTZX's 7.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTUX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund | 4.37% | 4.86% | 4.44% | 2.95% | 9.50% | 4.59% | 3.35% | 4.08% | 4.51% | 2.40% | 2.44% | 1.64% |
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund | 7.60% | 8.33% | 7.85% | 4.12% | 8.44% | 5.29% | 3.60% | 5.86% | 5.75% | 2.73% | 3.48% | 3.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, PHTUX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PHTUX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PLTZX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTUX dropped -31.76% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.
PHTUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHTUX and PLTZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer