PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTZX vs. PLTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTZX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 10.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLTZX having a 11.38% annualized return and PLTHX not far ahead at 11.71%.


PLTZX

1D
0.39%
1M
0.83%
6M
5.71%
YTD
9.14%
1Y
18.47%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
11.38%
ALL TIME*
10.48%

PLTHX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.51%
6M
6.74%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.14%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-9.24%22.68%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
10.52%19.91%17.18%20.28%-18.52%20.05%16.11%26.46%-9.93%21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTZX and PLTHX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.99

The correlation between PLTZX and PLTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTZX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTHX
PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTZXPLTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.47

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

10.58

-2.11

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the PLTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTZX and PLTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTZX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTHX drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZX and PLTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTZXPLTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-33.26%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-8.60%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-16.64%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.79%

-25.49%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

-33.26%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.06%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-4.76%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.01%

+0.02%

Volatility

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) is 3.41%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that PLTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTZXPLTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.62%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

10.84%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

13.13%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

15.65%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

15.96%

-0.01%

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTZX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLTZX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison

PLTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than PLTHX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
3.95%4.37%4.30%2.76%7.91%3.84%2.91%3.67%3.47%2.37%2.20%1.65%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.64%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PLTZX and PLTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTHX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to PLTZX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTZX dropped -34.01% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.

PLTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTZX and PLTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer