PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTUX vs. PLTNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PHTUX having a 10.33% return and PLTNX slightly higher at 10.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHTUX having a 12.08% annualized return and PLTNX not far ahead at 12.26%.


PHTUX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.53%
YTD
10.33%
6M
9.72%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
12.08%

PLTNX

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.52%
YTD
10.60%
6M
9.93%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
10.33%19.64%17.26%20.30%-18.48%19.08%15.94%25.59%-9.48%20.48%
PLTNX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund
10.60%19.89%17.25%20.33%-18.49%19.70%15.78%26.17%-9.84%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTUX and PLTNX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

1.00

The correlation between PHTUX and PLTNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTUX vs. PLTNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTUX
PHTUX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PHTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTNX
PLTNX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PLTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHTUXPLTNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.12

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

13.94

+0.07

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the PLTNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTUX and PLTNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTUX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTNX drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTUX and PLTNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTUXPLTNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.76%

-32.71%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-8.66%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-16.66%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-25.48%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.76%

-32.71%

+0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.95%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-4.76%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.94%

-0.04%

Volatility

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) have volatilities of 4.86% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTUXPLTNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

5.04%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

10.47%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

12.75%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

15.61%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

15.89%

-0.30%

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PHTUX and PLTNX have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PHTUX vs. PLTNX - Dividend Comparison

PHTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than PLTNX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
4.41%4.86%4.44%2.95%9.50%4.59%3.35%4.08%4.51%2.40%2.44%1.64%
PLTNX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund
4.15%4.59%4.40%2.84%9.11%4.23%3.11%3.47%4.68%2.21%1.99%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PHTUX and PLTNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTNX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PHTUX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTUX dropped -31.76% vs PLTNX's -32.71%.

PHTUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTUX and PLTNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer