PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTUX vs. PHTYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTUX achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than PHTYX's 10.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHTUX having a 11.75% annualized return and PHTYX not far behind at 11.21%.


PHTUX

1D
0.60%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.77%
6M
11.82%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.75%

PHTYX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.14%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.88%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
10.77%19.64%17.26%20.30%-18.48%19.08%15.94%25.59%-9.48%20.48%
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
10.01%18.54%16.13%19.35%-18.26%18.37%15.78%24.79%-9.07%19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTUX and PHTYX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

1.00

The correlation between PHTUX and PHTYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTUX vs. PHTYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTUX
PHTUX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PHTYX
PHTYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHTUXPHTYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.40

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

3.35

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.26

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.08

14.94

+0.14

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the PHTYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTUX and PHTYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHTUXPHTYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.40

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.76

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.69

0.00

Drawdowns

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTUX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PHTYX drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTUX and PHTYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTUXPHTYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.76%

-30.61%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-7.95%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-15.25%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-24.94%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.76%

-30.61%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-4.57%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.73%

+0.11%

Volatility

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTUXPHTYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.20%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

8.68%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

10.92%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

14.56%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

14.81%

+0.73%

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PHTUX and PHTYX have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PHTUX vs. PHTYX - Dividend Comparison

PHTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than PHTYX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
4.39%4.86%4.44%2.95%9.50%4.59%3.35%4.08%4.51%2.40%2.44%1.64%
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
4.49%4.94%4.41%3.05%9.68%4.72%3.45%3.63%4.66%2.24%2.00%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PHTUX and PHTYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PHTUX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PHTYX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTUX dropped -31.76% vs PHTYX's -30.61%.

PHTUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTUX and PHTYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer