PHO vs. SPHQ
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 12.00%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PHO vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 12.00%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
PHO vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -3.22% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.64% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and SPHQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PHO and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PHO vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
SPHQ
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PHO
SPHQ
Utilities
PHO
SPHQ
Technology
PHO
SPHQ
Healthcare
PHO
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PHO
SPHQ
Financial Services
PHO
SPHQ
Communication Services
PHO
-
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
SPHQ
Energy
PHO
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
PHO
-
SPHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
SPHQ
PHO vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.33 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 2.81 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 11.97 | -12.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -57.83% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -8.90% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -16.57% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -25.04% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -31.60% | -3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | -2.84% | -5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -10.67% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 2.08% | +3.74% |
Volatility
PHO vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 4.72%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 5.80% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 11.30% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.23% | 13.41% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 16.59% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 17.91% | +1.54% |
PHO vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.59% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to PHO (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.47% vs 12.00% for PHO. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer