PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHO vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHO vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.55%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


PHO

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-5.40%
6M
-7.93%
1Y
-3.67%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
11.55%

SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHO vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
-5.40%7.62%8.59%18.85%-14.86%31.28%20.83%37.57%-6.40%23.55%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PHO and SPHQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005

0.79

The correlation between PHO and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

PHO vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PHO
SPHQ

Industrials

56.3%
24.3%

Utilities

14.1%
1.0%

Technology

13.1%
28.1%

Basic Materials

8.4%
2.2%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.4%

Financial Services

0.0%
13.3%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.4%

Energy

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PHO
56.3%
SPHQ
24.3%

Utilities

PHO
14.1%
SPHQ
1.0%

Technology

PHO
13.1%
SPHQ
28.1%

Basic Materials

PHO
8.4%
SPHQ
2.2%

Healthcare

PHO
8.2%
SPHQ
8.4%

Financial Services

PHO
0.0%
SPHQ
13.3%

Communication Services

PHO

-

SPHQ
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PHO

-

SPHQ
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

PHO

-

SPHQ
15.4%

Energy

PHO

-

SPHQ
0.7%

Real Estate

PHO

-

SPHQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHO vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHO
PHO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHO vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHOSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.32

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

2.62

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

11.17

-11.86

PHO vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHO Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHO and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHOSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

1.85

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.89

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.84

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.53

-0.19

Drawdowns

PHO vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHOSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.62%

-57.83%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.78%

-8.90%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-16.57%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-25.04%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.92%

-31.60%

-3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.62%

0.00%

-10.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-10.70%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

2.08%

+3.23%

Volatility

PHO vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.49%. This indicates that PHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHOSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.49%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

10.18%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

12.62%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

16.45%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

17.86%

+1.59%

PHO vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHO vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
0.58%0.54%0.45%0.59%0.49%0.20%0.39%0.43%0.46%0.34%0.47%0.75%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHO and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHO has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to SPHQ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 11.55% for PHO. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.58% for PHO.

PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PHO and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHO and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer