PortfoliosLab logo
PHG vs. KLAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PHG and KLAC is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PHG vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHG:

-0.20

KLAC:

-0.01

Sortino Ratio

PHG:

0.08

KLAC:

0.31

Omega Ratio

PHG:

1.01

KLAC:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

PHG:

-0.07

KLAC:

-0.03

Martin Ratio

PHG:

-0.27

KLAC:

-0.05

Ulcer Index

PHG:

15.82%

KLAC:

18.92%

Daily Std Dev

PHG:

35.97%

KLAC:

48.69%

Max Drawdown

PHG:

-79.52%

KLAC:

-83.74%

Current Drawdown

PHG:

-53.78%

KLAC:

-20.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHG:

$22.70B

KLAC:

$93.01B

EPS

PHG:

$0.29

KLAC:

$27.49

PE Ratio

PHG:

84.62

KLAC:

25.51

PEG Ratio

PHG:

0.36

KLAC:

1.31

PS Ratio

PHG:

1.26

KLAC:

8.03

PB Ratio

PHG:

1.67

KLAC:

22.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHG:

$17.98B

KLAC:

$11.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHG:

$7.81B

KLAC:

$7.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

PHG:

$1.64B

KLAC:

$4.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHG achieves a -3.08% return, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PHG has underperformed KLAC with an annualized return of 1.87%, while KLAC has yielded a comparatively higher 30.77% annualized return.


PHG

YTD

-3.08%

1M

8.54%

6M

-7.78%

1Y

-8.71%

5Y*

-7.60%

10Y*

1.87%

KLAC

YTD

11.53%

1M

6.77%

6M

2.52%

1Y

-1.51%

5Y*

34.71%

10Y*

30.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHG vs. KLAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHG is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHG is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHG is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHG is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHG is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHG is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

KLAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLAC is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PHG vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PHG Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the KLAC Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHG and KLAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PHG vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison

PHG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PHG
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
0.00%0.00%0.00%6.95%3.03%1.87%2.17%3.11%2.52%3.18%3.94%4.17%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.90%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%26.17%

Drawdowns

PHG vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHG drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum KLAC drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHG and KLAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PHG vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) is 10.94%, while KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that PHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PHG vs. KLAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Koninklijke Philips N.V. and KLA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
4.10B
3.06B
(PHG) Total Revenue
(KLAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PHG vs. KLAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Koninklijke Philips N.V. and KLA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
45.1%
61.6%
(PHG) Gross Margin
(KLAC) Gross Margin
PHG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.1%.

KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.89B and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

PHG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported an operating income of 155.00M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

PHG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported a net income of 76.00M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.