PHG vs. INTC
PHG (Koninklijke Philips N.V.) and INTC (Intel Corporation) are both stocks. PHG operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while INTC operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PHG returned 1.91%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for INTC. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PHG vs. INTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHG achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 146.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PHG has underperformed INTC with an annualized return of 1.91%, while INTC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.
PHG
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -5.70%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- -7.86%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.33%
INTC
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -24.39%
- 6M
- 86.44%
- YTD
- 146.61%
- 1Y
- 371.26%
- 3Y*
- 38.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.92B | $11.42B | $14.46B | |
| $47.66M | $35.54M | $33.20M |
PHG vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHG Koninklijke Philips N.V. | 0.64% | 10.87% | 8.53% | 55.64% | -57.64% | -30.75% | 11.00% | 42.23% | -4.92% | 26.32% |
INTC Intel Corporation | 146.61% | 84.04% | -59.57% | 94.56% | -46.64% | 6.05% | -14.69% | 30.71% | 4.23% | 30.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHG and INTC is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHG and INTC has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PHG:
$25.64B
INTC:
$459.00B
PHG:
€1.15
INTC:
-$2.31
PHG:
1.25
INTC:
7.81
PHG:
1.93
INTC:
5.31
PHG:
€17.66B
INTC:
$57.03B
PHG:
€8.11B
INTC:
$22.02B
PHG:
€3.05B
INTC:
$12.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHG vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank
PHG
INTC
PHG vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHG | INTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.52 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 8.93 | -8.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 28.60 | -28.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHG vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHG drawdown since its inception was -79.61%, roughly equal to the maximum INTC drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHG and INTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHG | INTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.61% | -82.25% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.27% | -41.90% | +19.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.81% | -63.80% | +29.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.80% | -65.04% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.61% | -70.80% | -8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.99% | -35.43% | -15.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.31% | -36.61% | +7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 13.06% | -2.01% |
Volatility
PHG vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Koninklijke Philips N.V. (PHG) is 9.23%, while Intel Corporation (INTC) has a volatility of 23.66%. This indicates that PHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHG | INTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 23.66% | -14.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.92% | 59.14% | -36.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.42% | 78.79% | -50.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.65% | 54.08% | -16.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 45.26% | -13.34% |
Dividends
PHG vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison
PHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.87% | 1.47% | 5.52% | 2.70% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 2.56% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.79% |
PHG Koninklijke Philips N.V. | 3.86% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.43% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 1.97% | 2.82% | 2.02% | 2.51% | 2.98% |
Financials
PHG vs. INTC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Intel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PHG vs. INTC - Profitability Comparison
PHG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 4.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
INTC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.51B and revenue of 16.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.
PHG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported an operating income of 610.00M and revenue of 4.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
INTC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of 1.80B and revenue of 16.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
PHG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Koninklijke Philips N.V. reported a net income of 384.00M and revenue of 4.36B, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
INTC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -11.03B and revenue of 16.13B, resulting in a net margin of -68.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PHG and INTC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTC has higher volatility (23.66%) compared to PHG (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHG dropped -79.61% vs INTC's -82.25%.
INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHG and INTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer